A Wholesome ECE Education
Hu S.C.
2003
IEEE Transactions on Education
14
10.1109/TE.2003.818753
Fast advancing technologies will require a drastic transformation in the teaching of electrical and computer engineering (ECE). The current practice of compressing more and more materials into the four-year ECE curriculum must end. An ECE curriculum must be designed to provide students with solid fundamental knowledge and to teach them how to learn. It is more important to have a curriculum that teaches knowledge and skills that are long lasting and can he applied in new situations than one that teaches cutting-edge technology that may become obsolete in a few years. Electronic systems will be smaller, faster, smarter, and more complex. Most of the design work must be done using high-level abstractions. Besides being competent engineers, ECE graduates must be responsible and well-rounded citizens. After establishing a set of guiding principles, a liberal and broad-based curriculum with emphasis on a systematic approach to problem solving is suggested. An unconventional instructional approach is proposed and elaborated. Some of the nontechnology-related challenges facing ECE education are discussed.
Broad core; Global community; Hands-on application; High-level abstraction; Liberal education; Lifelong learning; Problem solving; Solid foundation; Systems approach; Well-rounded citizens
Director S.W., Et al., Reengineering the curriculum: Design and analysis of a new undergraduate electrical and computer engineering degree at Carnegie Mellon University, Proc. IEEE, 83, pp. 1246-1269, (1995); Farbrother B., New approach to electrical & computer engineering programs at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, 1997 ASEE Annu. Conf., (1997); Scoles K., Bilgutay N., ECE 21: A new curriculum in electrical and computer engineering, Proc. 29th Annu. Frontiers in Education Conf., 2, (1999); Schmalzel J.L., Et al., Composing a new ECE program: The first five years, Proc. 31st Annu. Frontiers in Education Conf., 2, (2001); Snyder T.D., Hoffman C.M., Dig. Education Statistics, 2002: Elementary and Secondary Education, pp. 173-177, (2003); Bordogna J., The 21st century engineer, IEEE Spectrum, 38, pp. 17-19, (2001); Lee E.A., Messerschmitt D.G., Engineering an education for the future, IEEE Computer, 31, pp. 77-85, (1998); Vahid F., The softening of hardware, IEEE Computer, 36, pp. 27-34, (2003); Lucky R., Electrical engineering: A diminishing role?, IEEE Spectrum, 35, (1998); Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2003-2004 Cycle, (2002); Roppel T., Et al., Interdisciplinary laboratory sequence in electrical and computer engineering: Curriculum design and assessment results, IEEE Trans. Educ., 42, pp. 143-152, (2000); Rugarcia A., Felder R.M., Woods D.R., Stice J.E., The future of engineering education: I. A vision for a new century, Chem. Eng. Educ., 34, 1, pp. 16-25, (2000); Felder R.M., Woods D.R., Stice J.E., Rugarcia A., The future of engineering education: II. Teaching methods that work, Chem. Eng. Educ., 34, 1, pp. 26-39, (2000); Woods D.R., Felder R.M., Rugarcia A., Stice J.E., The future of engineering education. III. Developing critical skills, Chem. Eng. Educ., 34, 2, pp. 108-117, (2000); Stice J.E., Felder R.M., Woods D.R., Rugarcia A., The future of engineering education. IV. Learning how to teach, Chem. Eng. Educ., 34, 2, pp. 118-127, (2000); Felder R.M., Rugarcia A., Stice J.E., The future of engineering education. V. Assessing teaching effectiveness and educational scholarship, Chem. Eng. Educ., 34, 3, pp. 198-207, (2000); Felder R.M., Stice J.E., Rugarcia A., The future of engineering education VI. Making reform happen, Chem. Eng. Educ., 34, 3, pp. 208-215, (2000)
Article
Scopus