CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Dissenting voices: A reply to Maskell
Tác giả
Suissa J.
Năm xuất bản
2000
Source title
Journal of Philosophy of Education
Số trích dẫn
1
DOI
10.1111/1467-9752.00179
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
Duke Maskell (Journal of Philosophy of Education, 32.2) argues that 'our idea of education is puerile' and that we need to rethink it. Drawing on the work of Jane Austen, he essentially reasserts the classic nineteenth-century ideal of Liberal Education. Yet in so doing, Maskell fails to acknowledge the social and political implications of this ideal. I argue that if we wish to engage in a rigorous philosophical debate on education, we cannot afford to ignore the social and political context implied by our educational concepts. Furthermore, this debate can be enriched by an understanding of alternative, dissenting positions on education, specifically, in this context, that of early Socialist and Anarchist thinkers.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Austen J., Sense and Sensibility, (1906); Bakunin M., Integral education, Égalité, (1869); Wilfred C., Harnett A., Education and the Struggle for Democracy: The Politics of Educational Ideas, (1996); Edwards S., Selected Writings of P. J. Proudhon, (1969); Johnson R., Really useful knowledge': Radical education and working-class culture, 1790-1848, Working Class Culture; Studies in History and Theory, (1979); Marshall P., The Anarchist Writings of William Godwin, (1986); Maskell D., Education, education, education: Or, what has Jane Austen to teach Tony Blunkett?, Journal of Philosophy of Education, (1999); Shotton J., No Master High or Low; Libertarian Education and Schooling in Britain, 1890-1990, (1993); Smith M., The Libertarians and Education, (1983); Ward C., Peter Kropotkin's 'Fields, Factories and Workshops Tomorrow', (1974); White J., The Aims of Education Restated, (1982)
Nơi xuất bản
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Hình thức xuất bản
Article
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus