CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
formative peer review of teaching: Attitudes of faculty at liberal arts colleges toward colleague assessment
Tác giả
Keig L.
Năm xuất bản
2000
Source title
Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education
Số trích dẫn
36
DOI
10.1023/A:1008194230542
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
Nearly all students of faculty evaluation agree that peer review should be part of a comprehensive program of faculty assessment. Faculty are particularly well qualified to critique their colleagues' teaching when the objective is to improve quality of instruction because they are in a position to assess several aspects of teaching better than students, academic administrators, and other constituencies of the academic community. Large proportions of faculty in this study indicated they would take part in four methods of formative peer review-classroom observation, videotaping of classes, evaluation of course materials, and assessment of their evaluation of the academic work of students-and they provide important information on factors that might detract from their participation, on conditions that might enhance the process, and on the benefits they and their students, colleagues, and institutions might receive as a result of their participation. © 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abrami P.C., Dimensions of effective college instruction, Review of Higher Education, 8, pp. 211-228, (1985); Aleamoni L.M., Standards for Evaluation of Instruction. Note to the Faculty, 11, (1981); Aleamoni L.M., Some practical approaches for faculty and administrators, New Directions for Teaching and Learning: No. 31. Techniques for Evaluating and Improving Teaching, pp. 75-78, (1987); Aleamoni L.M., Student rating myths versus research facts from 1924 to 1998, Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 13, 2, pp. 153-166, (1999); Arreola R.A., Evaluation of faculty performance: Key issues, Changing Practices in Faculty Evaluation: a Critical Assessment and Recommendations for Improvement, pp. 79-85, (1984); Arreola R.A., Developing a Comprehensive Evaluation System: A Handbook for College Faculty and Administrators on Designing and Operating a Comprehensive Faculty Evaluation System, (1995); Austin A.E., Supporting junior faculty through a teaching fellows program, New Directions for Teaching and Learning: No. 50. Developing New and Junior Faculty, pp. 73-86, (1992); Austin A.E., Supporting the professor as teacher: The Lilly Teaching Fellows Program, Review of Higher Education, 16, pp. 85-106, (1992); Austin J., Sweet A., Overholt C., To see ourselves as others see us: The rewards of classroom observation, Education for Judgment: The Artistry of Discussion Leadership, pp. 215-229, (1991); Baldwin R.G., Faculty vitality beyond the research university, Journal of Higher Education, 61, pp. 160-180, (1990); Bell M.E., Dobson E.C., Gram J.M., Peer evaluation as a method of faculty development, Journal of the College and University Personnel Administration, 25, 4, pp. 15-17, (1977); Blackwell R., McLean M., Faculty observation of teaching and staff development, Higher Education Quarterly, 50, 2, pp. 156-171, (1996); Boyer E.L., College: The Undergraduate Years, (1987); Boyer E.L., Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate, Princeton, (1990); Brinko K.T., The practice of giving feedback to improve teaching: What is effective?, Journal of Higher Education, 64, pp. 574-593, (1993); Britt Jr. N., Faculty attitudes about colleague evaluation of teaching, Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, (1982); Brock S.C., Evaluation-based teacher development, Handbook of Teacher Evaluation, pp. 229-243, (1981); Bulcock J.W., Why Can't We Define Good Teaching?, (1984); Cancelli A., Methods for Arriving at Clinical Judgments in Peer Evaluation, (1987); Centra J.A., Determining Faculty Effectiveness: Assessing Teaching, Research, and Service for Personnel Decisions and Improvement, (1979); Centra J.A., Colleague Evaluation: The Critical Link, (1986); Centra J.A., Reflective Faculty Evaluation: Enhancing Teaching and Determining Faculty Effectiveness, (1993); Almanac Issue, (1997); Cohen P.A., McKeachie W.J., The role of colleagues in the evaluation of college teaching, Improving College and University Teaching, 25, 4, pp. 147-154, (1980); Copeland W.D., Jamgochian R., Colleague training and peer review, Journal of Teacher Education, 56, 2, pp. 18-21, (1985); Cowen D.L., Davis G.L., Bird S.E., Peer review in medical education, Journal of Medical Education, 51, pp. 130-131, (1976); Cross K.P., A proposal to improve teaching-or-what taking teaching seriously should mean, AAHE Bulletin, 39, 1, pp. 9-14, (1986); Cross K.P., Using Assessment to Improve Instruction, (1986); Dressel P.L., Faculty, Handbook of Academic Evaluation, pp. 331-375, (1976); Ellett C.D., McMullen J.H., Rugutt J.K., Culross R.R., Linking Personal Learning Environment, Quality of Teaching and Learning, and Learning Efficacy: An Initial Study of College Students, (1997); Eble K.E., The Craft of Teaching: a Guide to Mastering the Professor's Art, (1988); Edgerton R., All roads lead to teaching, AAHE Bulletin, 40, 8, pp. 3-9, (1988); Edgerton R., Hutchings P., Quinlan K., The Teaching Portfolio: Capturing the Scholarship of Teaching, (1991); Elbow P., One-to-one faculty development, New Directions for Teaching and Learning: No. 4. Learning about Teaching, pp. 25-40, (1980); Elbow P., Embracing Contraries: Explorations in Learning and Teaching, (1986); Fact Book on Higher Education, (1998); Fairweather J.S., Academic values and faculty rewards, Review of Higher Education, 17, 1, pp. 43-68, (1993); Glassick C.E., Huber M.T., Maeroff G.I., Scholarship Assessed: Evaluation of the Professoriate, (1997); Golin S., Four arguments for peer collaboration & student interviewing: The Master Faculty Program, AAHE Bulletin, 43, 4, pp. 9-10, (1990); Hart F.R., Teachers observing teachers, Teaching at An Urban University, pp. 15-24, (1987); Hodgkinson H., Unlock your doors, let your colleagues in: Faculty rewards and assessment systems, The Academic Department and Division Chairman, pp. 208-215, (1972); Hoyt D.P., Howard G.S., The evaluation of faculty development programs, Research in Higher Education, 8, pp. 25-38, (1978); Hutchings P., The peer review of teaching: Progress, issues and prospects, Innovative Higher Education, 20, 4, pp. 221-234, (1996); Katz J., Henry M., Turning Professors into Teachers: A New Approach to Faculty Development and Student Learning, (1988); Keig L.W., Faculty Evaluation: Iowa Association of Independent Colleges and Universities, (1988); Keig L.W., Waggoner M.D., Collaborative Peer Review: The Role of Faculty in Improving College Teaching, (1994); Keig L.W., Waggoner M.D., Peer review of teaching: Improving college instruction through formative assessment, Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 6, 3, pp. 51-83, (1995); Licata C.M., Post-tenure Faculty Evaluation: Opportunity or Threat, (1986); Lindquist J., Approaches to collegiate teaching improvement, Designing Teaching Improvement Programs, pp. 1-22, (1979); Mathias H., Rutherford D., Course evaluation at Birmingham: Some implications for the evaluation of university teaching, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 7, 3, pp. 263-266, (1982); Mathias H., Rutherford D., Lecturers as evaluators: The Birmingham experience, Studies in Higher Education, 7, 1, pp. 47-56, (1982); Mathis B.C., Persuading the Institution to Experiment: Strategies for Seduction, (1979); McKeachie W.J., Teaching Tips (9th Ed.), (1994); McKeachie W.J., Kaplan M., Persistent problems in evaluating college teaching, AAHE Bulletin, 48, 6, pp. 5-8, (1996); Menges R.J., Career-span faculty development, College Teaching, 55, 4, pp. 181-184, (1985); Menges R.J., Colleagues as catalysts for change in teaching, To Improve the Academy, 6, pp. 83-93, (1987); Millis B.J., Colleagues helping colleagues: A peer observation program model, Journal of Staff, Program, and Organization Development, 7, 1, pp. 15-21, (1989); Millis B.J., Conducting effective peer classroom observations, To Improve the Academy, 11, pp. 189-206, (1992); Millis B.J., Faculty development in the 1990s: What is it and why we can't wait, Journal of Counseling and Development, 72, pp. 454-464, (1994); Millis B.J., Forging the ties that bind: Peer mentoring part-time faculty, New Directions for Teaching and Learning: No. 57. Mentoring Revisited: Making An Impact on Individuals and Institution, pp. 73-80, (1994); Millis B.J., Kaplan B.B., Enhancing teaching through peer classroom observations, Improving College Teaching, pp. 137-151, (1995); Digest of Educational Statistics, (1997); Partners in Learning, (1991); Peer review of teaching institute, AAHE Bulletin, 46, 10, (1993); Perlberg A., When professors confront themselves: Toward a theoretical conceptualization of video self-confrontation in higher education, Higher Education, 12, pp. 633-663, (1983); The business of the business, Policy Perspectives, 1, pp. 1-7, (1989); Quinlan K.M., Faculty perspectives on peer review, Thought and Action, 11, 2, pp. 5-22, (1995); Quinlan K.M., Involving peers in the evaluation and improvement of teaching: A menu of strategies, Innovative Higher Education, 20, 4, pp. 299-307, (1996); Rice R.E., Cheldelin S.I., The Knower and the Known: Making the Connections: Evaluation of the New Jersey Master Faculty Program, (1989); Scriven M.S., The Evaluation of College Teaching, (1980); Scriven M.S., Evaluation ideologies, Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation, pp. 242-249, (1983); Scriven M.S., New frontiers of evaluation, Evaluation Practices, 7, 1, pp. 7-44, (1985); Seldin P., Changing Practices in Faculty Evaluation, (1984); Seldin P., How Administrators Can Improve Teaching: Moving from Talk to Action in Higher Education, (1990); Seldin P., How colleges evaluate teaching, 1988 vs 1998, AAHE Bulletin, 50, 7, pp. 3-7, (1998); Shatzky J., Silberman R., Master-students: A teaching technique, Journal of College Science Teaching, 16, pp. 119-120, (1986); Skoog G., Improving college teaching through peer observation, Journal of Teacher Education, 31, 2, pp. 23-25, (1980); Snedecor F.W., Cochran W.G., Statistical Methods (6th Ed.), (1967); Soderberg L.O., A credible model: Evaluating classroom teaching in higher education, Instructional Evaluation, 8, pp. 13-27, (1986); Stoner M., Martin L., Talking about Teaching Across the Disciplines: How Cognitive Peer Coaching Makes It Happen, (1993); Involvement in Learning: Realizing the Potential of American Higher Education, (1984); Sweeney J.M., A report on the development and use of a faculty peer evaluation/development program, Dissertation Abstracts International, 37, (1976); Sweeney J.M., Grasha A.F., Improving teaching through faculty development triads, Educational Technology, 19, 2, pp. 54-57, (1979); Weimer M., Translating evaluation results into teaching improvements, AAHE Bulletin, 59, 8, pp. 8-11, (1987); Wilson R.C., Dienst E.R., Watson N.L., Characteristics of effective college teachers as perceived by their colleagues, Journal of Educational Measurement, 10, pp. 31-37, (1973); Woolwine D.E., New Jersey Master Faculty Program Research Report, (1988)
Nơi xuất bản
Kluwer Academic Publishers
Hình thức xuất bản
Review
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus