Winning and giving: Football results and alumni giving at selective private colleges and universities
Turner S.E.; Meserve L.A.; Bowen W.G.
2001
Social Science Quarterly
39
10.1111/0038-4941.00061
Objective. Our central question is how changes in an institution's football success affect giving behavior. Also, we consider whether former varsity athletes are more or less sensitive in their giving behavior than other alumni to the competitive success of their school and whether such effects differ by type of institution. Methods. Using micro data from 15 academically selective private colleges and universities, the analysis presents fixed-effects estimates of how football winning percentages affect giving behavior. Results. General giving rates are unaffected by won-lost records at the high-profile Division IA schools and at the Ivy League schools. Increases in winning percentages yield modest positive increases in giving rates, particularly among former atheletes, at the lower-profile Division III liberal arts colleges. Conclusions. While there is a modest positive effect at Division III colleges, our results do not support the notion that winning and giving go hand-in-hand at the selective private universities that play big-time football.
Baade R., Sundberg J., Fourth down and gold to go? assessing the link between athletics and alumni giving, Social Science Quarterly, 77, 4, pp. 75-81, (1996); What determines alumni generosity?, Economics of Education Review, 15, 1, pp. 75-81, (1996); Bowen W.G., Derek B., The Shape of the River: Long-term Consequences of Considering Race in College and University Admissions, (1998); Brooker G., Klostorin T., To the victors belong the spoils? college athletics and alumni giving, Social Science Quarterly, 62, 4, pp. 744-750, (1981); Cough C., Erekson O.H., Contributions to intercollegiate athletic programs: Further evidence, Social Science Quarterly, 66, MARCH, pp. 194-202, (1985); Cronin D., Donations up since Louisville hired pitano, USA Today April 3, (2001); Frey J., The winning team myth, Currents, JANUARY, (1985); Groen J., White M., In-state Versus Our-of-state Students: The Divergence of Interest between Public Universities and State Governments, (2001); McCormick R., Tinsley M., Athletics versus academics? evidence from SAT scores, Journal of Political Economy, 95, 5, pp. 1103-1116, (1987); Menand L., Sporting chances, The New Yorker, pp. 84-88, (2001); Noll R., The business of college sports and the high cost of winning, Milken Institute Review, FALL, pp. 24-37, (1999); Shulman J., Bowen W., The Game of Life: College Sports and Educational Values, (2001); Sigelman L., Bookheimer S., Is it whether you win or lose? monetary contributions to big-time college athletic programs, Social Science Quarterly, 64, JUNE, pp. 347-359, (1983); Sigelman L., Carter R., Win one for the giver? alumni giving and big-time college sports, Social Science Quarterly, 60, pp. 284-294, (1979); Sperber M., Beer and Circus: How Big-time College Sports Is Crippling Undergraduate Education, (2000); Zimbalist A., Unpaid Professionals, (1999)
Blackwell Publishing Inc.
Article
Scopus