CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Science education and the commonplaces of science
Tác giả
Helms J.V.; Carlone H.B.
Năm xuất bản
1999
Source title
Science Education
Số trích dẫn
12
DOI
10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199903)83:2<233::AID-SCE8>3.0.CO;2-9
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
In this paper, we describe science as a set of "commonplaces," similar to Schwab's commonplaces of teaching, for framing the nature of science and science education (Schwab, J. J. [1978]. Science Curriculum, and Liberal Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press). Framed thoughtfully, these commonplaces have the potential to incorporate insights from a variety of perspectives. We propose four formulations of the commonplaces of science, based on distinct views of the nature of science, and explore the consequences of each. We argue that, although there are strengths to each formulation, some commonplaces prove more comprehensive than others in capturing the essence of science for the purposes of developing curriculum, educating science teachers, and conducting science education research. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Sci Ed 83:233-245, 1999.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Science for All Americans: A Project 2061 Report on Literacy Goals in Science, Mathematics, and Technology, (1989); Benchmarks for Scientific Literacy, (1993); Atwater M., Research on cultural diversity in the classroom, Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning, pp. 558-576, (1994); Barnes B., Shapin S., Natural Order: Historical Studies of Scientific Culture, (1979); Bauer H.H., Scientific Literacy and the Myth of the Scientific Method, (1992); Brickhouse N.W., Teachers beliefs about the nature of science and their relationship to classroom practice, Journal of Teacher Education, 41, pp. 53-62, (1990); Bruner J., The Process of Education, (1960); Science Framework for California Public Schools Kindergarten through Grade Twelve, (1990); Callon M., Four models for the dynamics of science, Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, pp. 29-63, (1995); Chalmers A., What is this Thing Called Science?, (1982); Cobern W., Science education as an exercise in foreign affairs, Science and Education, 4, pp. 287-302, (1995); Collins H.M., Shapin S., Experiment, science teaching, and the new history and sociology of science, Teaching the History of Science, pp. 67-79, (1989); Collins H.M., Pinch T.J., The Golem: What Everyone Should Know about Science, (1993); Cozzens S., Woodhouse E., Science, government, and the politics of knowledge, Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, pp. 533-553, (1995); Cunningham C.M., The Effect of Teachers' Sociological Understanding of Science on Classroom Practice and Curriculum Innovation, (1995); Cunningham C.M., Helms J., Sociology of science as a means to a more authentic, inclusive science education, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, pp. 483-499, (1998); Dickson D., The New Politics of Science, (1988); Duschl R., Restructuring Science Education: The Importance of Theories and their Development, (1990); Duschl R., Research on the history and philosophy of science, Handbook of Research in Science Teaching, pp. 443-465, (1994); Duschl R., Wright E., A case study of high school teachers' decision making models for planning and teaching science, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26, pp. 467-501, (1989); Gallagher J.J., Prospective and practicing secondary school science teachers' knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of science, Science Education, 75, pp. 121-133, (1991); Giere R.N., Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach, (1988); Gieryn T., Boundaries of science, Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, pp. 393-443, (1995); Good R., Comments on multicultural science education, Science Education, 79, pp. 335-336, (1995); Haraway D., Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, (1990); Harding S., The Science Question in Feminism, (1986); Harding S., Is there a feminist method?, Feminism and Science, pp. 17-32, (1989); Harding S., Whose science? Whose knowledge?, Thinking from Women's Lives, (1990); Keller E.F., Reflections on Gender and Science, (1985); Kelly G., Carlsen W., Cunningham C., Science education in sociocultural context: Perspectives from the sociology of science, Science Education, 77, pp. 207-220, (1993); Knorr-Cetina K., Laboratory studies: The cultural approach to the study of science, Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, pp. 140-166, (1995); Krugly-Smolska E., Scientific culture, multiculturalism and the science classroom, Science and Education, 5, pp. 21-29, (1996); Kuhn T.S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, (1962); Latour B., Science in Action, (1987); Latour B., Woolgar S., Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, (1986); Lederman N.G., Students' and teachers' conception of the nature of science: A review of research, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, pp. 331-359, (1992); Longino H., Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry, (1990); Loving C., Comment on "multiculturalism, universalism, and science education., Science Education, 79, pp. 341-348, (1995); Matthews M., History, Philosophy, and Science Teaching, (1991); Matthews M., Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science, (1994); Meichtry Y.J., The impact of science curricula on student views about the nature of science, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, pp. 429-443, (1993); Millar R., What is 'scientific method' and can it be taught?, Teaching Science, pp. 164-177, (1994); Millar R., Science education for democracy: What can the school curriculum achieve?, Science Today: Problem or Crisis?, pp. 87-101, (1997); National Science Education Standards, (1996); Restivo S., Modern science as a social problem, Social Problems, 35, pp. 206-225, (1988); Restivo S., Science, Society, and Values: Toward a Sociology of Objectivity, (1994); Schwab J.J., Science, Curriculum, and Liberal Education, (1978); Shapin S., Pump and circumstance: Robert Boyle's literary technology, Social Studies of Science, 14, pp. 481-520, (1984); Solomon J., Aikenhead G., STS Education: International Perspectives on Reform, (1994); Solomon J., Conflict between mainstream science and STS in science education, STS Education: International Perspective on Reform, pp. 3-10, (1994); Southerland S.A., Acknowledging student agency: Multiculturalism, scientism, and science education, Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, (1996); Stanley W.B., Brickhouse N.W., Multiculturalism, universalism, and science education, Science Education, 78, pp. 387-398, (1994); Traweek S., Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists, (1988); Yager R., Science/Technology/Society as Reform in Science Education, (1996); Zeidler D.L., Lederman N.G., Science teachers' conception of the nature of science: Do they really influence teaching behavior?, Science Education, 71, pp. 721-734, (1987)
Nơi xuất bản
Wiley-Liss Inc.
Hình thức xuất bản
Article
Open Access
All Open Access; Green Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus