The case for course substitutions as a reasonable accommodation for students with foreign language learning difficulties
Shaw R.A.
1999
Journal of Learning Disabilities
20
10.1177/002221949903200406
It has been observed for decades that some students have a particularly difficult time learning another language. Colleges and universities have an obligation to offer special language programs designed to help these students succeed in their attempts to learn another language. However, for those few students who cannot learn another language even with special instruction, allowing them to meet the foreign language requirement though the substitution of related courses is appropriate and does not constitute a fundamental alteration of the goals of a liberal education.
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990; Arries J., An experimental Spanish course for learning disabled students, Hispania, 77, pp. 110-117, (1994); Baron N.S., Rationales and rationalizations in foreign language requirements, Liberal Education, 68, pp. 181-191, (1982); Block L., Effective Language Teaching for Students with Learning Disabilities, (1996); Brod R., Huber B.J., The MLA survey of foreign language entrance and degree requirements 1994-95, ADFL Bulletin, 28, pp. 35-43, (1996); Carroll J.B., Twenty-five years of research on foreign language aptitude, Individual Differences and Universals in Language Learning Aptitude, pp. 87-136, (1981); Cummins J., Bilingualism and Special Education: Issues in Assessment and Pedagogy, (1984); Demuth K., Smith N., The foreign language requirement: An alternative program, Foreign Language Annals, 20, pp. 67-77, (1987); Dinklage K., Inability to learn a foreign language, Emotional Problems of the Student, pp. 185-208, (1971); Downey D., Hill B., The foreign language modification program at the University of Colorado at Boulder, Meeting of the Rocky Mountain Language Association Convention, (1994); Dunkel H.B., The effect of personality on language achievement, Journal of Educational Psychology, 38, pp. 277-282, (1947); Gajar A., Foreign language learning disabilities: The identification of predictive and diagnostic variables, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, pp. 327-330, (1987); Ganschow L., Sparks R., A screening instrument for the identification of foreign language problems, Foreign Language Annals, 24, pp. 383-398, (1991); Ganschow L., Sparks R., Foreign" language learning disabilities: Issues, research and teaching implications, Success for College Students with Learning Disabilities, pp. 283-322, (1993); Ganschow L., Sparks R., Effects of direct instruction in phonology on the native language skills and foreign language aptitude of at-risk foreign language learners, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, pp. 107-120, (1995); Goodman J., Freed B., McManus W., Determining exemptions from foreign language requirements: Use of the Modern Language Aptitude Test, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 15, pp. 131-141, (1990); Hill B., Downey D.M., Sheppard M., Williamson V., Accommodating the needs of students with severe language learning disabilities in modified foreign language courses, Report of Central States Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages: Broadening the Frontiers of Foreign Language Education, (1995); Ho D.Y.F., Prediction of foreign language skills: A canonical and part canonical correlation study, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 12, pp. 119-130, (1987); Hughes C., Smith J., Cognitive and academic performance of college students with learning disabilities: A synthesis of the literature, Learning Disability Quarterly, 13, pp. 66-79, (1990); Javorsky J., Sparks R., Ganschow L., Perceptions of college students with and without specific learning disabilities about foreign language courses, Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 7, pp. 31-44, (1992); Kenneweg S., Meeting special learning needs in the Spanish curriculum of a college preparatory school, Get Ready, Get Set, Go! Action in the Foreign Language Classroom, pp. 16-18, (1988); Leons E., Herbert H., Conley C., The foreign language project at Landmark College, Sharing Our Gifts Conference, (1997); Levine M.D., Developmental Variation and Learning Disorders, (1987); Lewin T., Students lose on last issue in bias suit, The New York Times, (1998); Mabbott A.S., Students labeled learning disabled and the foreign language requirement: Background and suggestions for teachers, Faces in a Crowd: The Individual Learner in Multisection Courses, pp. 325-353, (1994); McCusker C.E., The Americans with Disabilities Act: Its potential for expanding the scope of reasonable academic accommodations, The Journal of College and University Law, 21, pp. 619-641, (1995); McGuire J., Shaw S., Policies and Procedures Survey, (1998); Milani A., Disabled students in higher education: Administrative and judicial enforcement of disability law, The Journal of College and University Law, 22, pp. 989-1043, (1996); Moore III F.X., Section 504 and the Americans with Disabilities Act: Accommodating the learning disabled student in the foreign language curriculum, ADFL Bulletin, 26, 2, pp. 59-62, (1995); Myer B., Ganschow L., Profiles of frustration: Second language learners with specific learning disabilities, Shaping the Future of Foreign Language Education: FLES, Articulation, and Proficiency, pp. 32-53, (1989); Myer B.J., Ganschow L., Sparks R., Kenneweg S., Cracking the code: Helping students with specific learning disabilities, Defining the Essentials for the Foreign Language Classroom, pp. 112-120, (1989); Rehabilitation Act of 1973; Rudolph F., The American College and University: A History, (1968); Rudolph F., Curriculum: A History of the American Undergraduate Course of Study, (1977); Rudy W., The Evolving Liberal Arts Curriculum: A Historical Review of Basic Themes, (1960); Schaefer W.D., Education Without Compromise: From Chaos to Coherence in Higher Education, (1990); Schneider E., A multisensory, direct approach to teaching German as a foreign language to at-risk college students, NEBODS Newsletter, 1, pp. 14-15, (1995); Schneider E., Teaching Foreign Languages to At-risk Learners, (1996); Sparks R., Ganschow L., Foreign language learning difficulties: Affective or native language aptitude differences?, Modern Language Journal, 75, pp. 3-16, (1991); Sparks R., Ganschow L., The effects of a multisensory structured language approach on the native and foreign language aptitude of at-risk foreign language learners: A follow-up and replication study, Annals of Dyslexia, 43, pp. 194-216, (1993); Sparks R., Ganschow L., The impact of native language learning problems on foreign language learning: Case study illustrations of the linguistic coding deficit hypothesis, The Modern Language Journal, 77, pp. 58-74, (1993); Sparks R., Ganschow L., Searching for the cognitive locus of foreign language learning difficulties: Linking first and second language learning, The Modern Language Journal, 77, pp. 289-302, (1993); Sparks R., Ganschow L., Artzer M., Patton J., Foreign language proficiency of at-risk and not-at-risk learners over 2 years of foreign language instruction: A follow-up study, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, pp. 92-98, (1997); Sparks R., Ganschow L., Fluharty K., Little S., An exploratory study on the effects of Latin on the native language skills and foreign language aptitude of students with and without learning disabilities, The Classical Journal, 91, pp. 165-184, (1995); Sparks R., Ganschow L., Javorsky J., Diagnosing and accommodating the foreign language learning difficulties of college students with learning disabilities, Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 7, pp. 150-160, (1992); Sparks R., Ganschow L., Kenneweg S., Miller K., Using Orton-Gillingham methodology to teach a foreign language to learning disabled/dyslexic students: Explicit teaching of phonology in a second language, Annals of Dyslexia, 41, pp. 96-118, (1991); Sparks R., Ganschow L., Patton J., Prediction of performance in first-year foreign language courses: Connections between native and foreign language learning, Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, pp. 638-655, (1995); Sparks R., Ganschow L., Patton J., Artzer M., Seibenhar D., Plageman M., Prediction of foreign language proficiency, Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, pp. 549-561, (1997); Sparks R., Ganschow L., Pohlman J., Linguistic coding deficits in foreign language learners, Annals of Dyslexia, 39, pp. 179-195, (1989); Sparks R., Ganschow L., Pohlman J., Skinner S., Artzer M., The effects of multisensory structured language instruction on native language and foreign language aptitude skills of at-risk high school foreign language learners, Annals of Dyslexia, 42, pp. 25-53, (1992); Sparks R., Philips L., Ganschow L., Students classified as learning disabled and the college foreign language requirement: A case study of one university, Patterns and Policies: The Changing Demographics of Foreign Language Instruction, pp. 123-159, (1996); Sudermann D., Cisar M., Foreign language across the curriculum: A critical appraisal, The Modern Language Journal, 76, pp. 295-308, (1992); Van Doren M., Liberal Education, (1943); Weingartner R.H., Undergraduate Education, (1992); Winter D.G., McClelland D.C., Stewart A.J., A New Case for the Liberal Arts, (1981)
SAGE Publications Ltd
Article
Scopus