CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Education, Change, and Transformation: The Prison Experience

Tác giả

Duguid S.; Pawson R.

Năm xuất bản

1998

Source title

Evaluation Review

Số trích dẫn

26

DOI

10.1177/0193841X9802200403

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0345107106&doi=10.1177%2f0193841X9802200403&partnerID=40&md5=453ba05a88011383130a01315237202d

Tóm tắt

This article explores the transformative capacity of education by using realistic evaluation methodology in the context of a follow-up study of 654 Canadian former federal prisoners who had been part of a liberal arts university prison education program. After release, 75% of the prisoners remained free of reincarceration for at least 3 years. The study examines in detail three groups within the 654: a group of 119 whose academic performance improved, a group of 99 whose academic performance was consistently high and who were active in program affairs, and a group of 118 who were high school dropouts from broken homes. Using a recidivism prediction device (Statistical Information on Recidivism - SIR), subgroups are identified based on biographic and/or academic variables and actual postrelease success or failure compared with the prediction.

Từ khóa

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ayers J., Duguid S., Montague C., Wolowydnik S., Effects of University of Victoria Program: a Post-release Study, (1980); Recidivism of Prisoners Released in 1983, (1989); Chen H., Theory-driven Evaluation, (1990); Chen H., Rossi P., The multi-goal theory-driven approach to evaluation: A model linking basic and applied social science, Evaluation Studies Review Annual, 6, pp. 38-54, (1981); Cleveland W., The history of California's Arts in Corrections Program, Yearbook of Correctional Education, (1989); Connell J., Kubish A., Schon L., Weiss C., New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives, (1995); Cormier R., Yes Sir! a stable risk prediction tool, Forum on Correctional Research, 9, 1, pp. 3-7, (1997); The Statistical Information on Recidivism Scale, (1989); So you want to know the recidivism rate?, Forum on Corrections Research, 5, 3, pp. 22-26, (1993); Duguid S., Cognitive dissidents bite the dust: The demise of university education in Canada's prisons, Convergence, 26, 3, pp. 51-64, (1993); Gottfredson S., Bonds J.A., A Manual for Intake Base Expectancy Scoring, (1961); Gottfredson S., Gottfredson D., The long-term predictive utility of the Base Expectancy score, The Howard Journal, 32, 4, pp. 276-290, (1993); Haan R., Harman W., Release Risk Prediction: a Test of the Nuffield Scoring System, (1988); Hare R., Without Conscience: the Disturbing World of the Psychopaths among us, (1993); Hart S., The Arts in Prisons, (1983); Hoffman P., Beck J., Parole decision-making: A Salient Factor Score, Journal of Criminal Justice, 2, pp. 195-206, (1974); Nuffield J., Parole Decision-making in Canada: Research Towards Decision Guidelines, (1982); Nuttall C., Parole in England and Wales, (1977); Pawson R., A Measure for Measures: a Manifesto for Empirical Sociology, (1989); Pawson R., Tilley N., Realistic Evaluation, (1997); Ross R., Reading and rehabilitation, Crime And/et Justice, 6, 4, pp. 207-219, (1978); Smith L., Akers R., A comparison of recidivism of Florida's community control and prison: A five-year survival analysis, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 3, pp. 267-292, (1993); Stewart L., Millson W., Offender motivation for treatment as a responsivity factor, Forum of Corrections Research, 1, 3, pp. 3-7, (1995); Wormith S., Goldstone C., The clinical and statistical prediction of recidivism, Criminal Justice and Behavior, 11, 1, pp. 3-34, (1984)

Nơi xuất bản

SAGE Publications Inc.

Hình thức xuất bản

Article

Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus