Education, Change, and Transformation: The Prison Experience
Duguid S.; Pawson R.
1998
Evaluation Review
26
10.1177/0193841X9802200403
This article explores the transformative capacity of education by using realistic evaluation methodology in the context of a follow-up study of 654 Canadian former federal prisoners who had been part of a liberal arts university prison education program. After release, 75% of the prisoners remained free of reincarceration for at least 3 years. The study examines in detail three groups within the 654: a group of 119 whose academic performance improved, a group of 99 whose academic performance was consistently high and who were active in program affairs, and a group of 118 who were high school dropouts from broken homes. Using a recidivism prediction device (Statistical Information on Recidivism - SIR), subgroups are identified based on biographic and/or academic variables and actual postrelease success or failure compared with the prediction.
Ayers J., Duguid S., Montague C., Wolowydnik S., Effects of University of Victoria Program: a Post-release Study, (1980); Recidivism of Prisoners Released in 1983, (1989); Chen H., Theory-driven Evaluation, (1990); Chen H., Rossi P., The multi-goal theory-driven approach to evaluation: A model linking basic and applied social science, Evaluation Studies Review Annual, 6, pp. 38-54, (1981); Cleveland W., The history of California's Arts in Corrections Program, Yearbook of Correctional Education, (1989); Connell J., Kubish A., Schon L., Weiss C., New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives, (1995); Cormier R., Yes Sir! a stable risk prediction tool, Forum on Correctional Research, 9, 1, pp. 3-7, (1997); The Statistical Information on Recidivism Scale, (1989); So you want to know the recidivism rate?, Forum on Corrections Research, 5, 3, pp. 22-26, (1993); Duguid S., Cognitive dissidents bite the dust: The demise of university education in Canada's prisons, Convergence, 26, 3, pp. 51-64, (1993); Gottfredson S., Bonds J.A., A Manual for Intake Base Expectancy Scoring, (1961); Gottfredson S., Gottfredson D., The long-term predictive utility of the Base Expectancy score, The Howard Journal, 32, 4, pp. 276-290, (1993); Haan R., Harman W., Release Risk Prediction: a Test of the Nuffield Scoring System, (1988); Hare R., Without Conscience: the Disturbing World of the Psychopaths among us, (1993); Hart S., The Arts in Prisons, (1983); Hoffman P., Beck J., Parole decision-making: A Salient Factor Score, Journal of Criminal Justice, 2, pp. 195-206, (1974); Nuffield J., Parole Decision-making in Canada: Research Towards Decision Guidelines, (1982); Nuttall C., Parole in England and Wales, (1977); Pawson R., A Measure for Measures: a Manifesto for Empirical Sociology, (1989); Pawson R., Tilley N., Realistic Evaluation, (1997); Ross R., Reading and rehabilitation, Crime And/et Justice, 6, 4, pp. 207-219, (1978); Smith L., Akers R., A comparison of recidivism of Florida's community control and prison: A five-year survival analysis, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 3, pp. 267-292, (1993); Stewart L., Millson W., Offender motivation for treatment as a responsivity factor, Forum of Corrections Research, 1, 3, pp. 3-7, (1995); Wormith S., Goldstone C., The clinical and statistical prediction of recidivism, Criminal Justice and Behavior, 11, 1, pp. 3-34, (1984)
SAGE Publications Inc.
Article
Scopus