CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Faculty gender effects on academic research and teaching
Tác giả
Gander J.P.
Năm xuất bản
1999
Source title
Research in Higher Education
Số trích dẫn
29
DOI
10.1023/A:1018782513285
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
This paper estimates the effects of faculty gender differences on research and teaching productivities, using a sample of 523 four-year-plus institutions of higher education for the academic year 1987-88. Female and male faculty inputs along with an administrative staff input are used to estimate three joint-product production functions for three outputs from undergraduate teaching, graduate teaching, and research. The main research results show that female faculty have significant marginal productivity in research at liberal arts institutions but not at institutions in other Carnegie categories. One explanation for this finding is the limitations with respect to employment and discipline patterns of using research expenditures to measure research output. The results are compared to earlier findings based on individual faculty survey responses.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bayer A.E., Teaching faculty in academe: 1972-73, ACE Research Reports No. 8, 8, (1973); Blackburn R.T., Behymer C., Hall D., Research note: Correlates of faculty publications, Sociology of Education, 51, 2, pp. 315-327, (1978); Brinkman P.T., Factors affecting instructional costs at major universities, The Journal of Higher Education, 52, 3, pp. 265-279, (1981); Broder I.E., Professional achievements and gender differences among academic economists, Economic Inquiry, 31, 1, pp. 116-127, (1993); A Classification of Institutions of Higher Education, (1987); Carr P., Friedman R.H., Moskowitz M.A., Kazis L.E., Weed H.G., Research, academic rank, and compensation of women and men faculty in academic general internal medicine, Journal of General Internal Medicine, 7, 4, pp. 418-423, (1992); Cohn E., Rhine L.W., Santos M.C., Institutions of higher education as multi-product firms: Economies of scale and scope, Review of Economics and Statistics, 71, 2, pp. 284-290, (1989); Cole J.R., Fair Science: Women in the Scientific Community, (1979); Women in academic psychiatry and research, American Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 5, pp. 849-851, (1993); Creswell J.W., Faculty research performance: Lessons from the sciences and the social sciences, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4, 4, (1985); De Groot H., McMahon W.W., Volkwein J.F., The cost structure of American research universities, Review of Economics and Statistics, 73, 3, pp. 424-431, (1991); Dial T.H., Bickel J., Lewicki A.M., Sex differences in rank attainment among radiology and internal medicine faculty, Academic Medicine, 64, 4, pp. 198-202, (1989); Dwyer M.M., Flynn A.A., Inman P.S., Differential progress of women faculty: Status 1980-1990, Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 7, pp. 173-222, (1991); Ferber M.A., Green C.A., Traditional or reverse sex discrimination? A case study of a large public university, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 35, 4, pp. 550-564, (1982); Ferber M.A., Loeb J.W., Lowry H.M., The economic status of women faculty: A reappraisal, Journal of Human Resources, 13, 3, pp. 385-401, (1978); Finkelstein M.J., The American Academic Profession: A Synthesis of Social Scientific Inquiry Since World War II, (1984); Fish M., Gibbons J.D., A comparison of the publications of female and male economists, Journal of Economic Education, 20, 1, pp. 93-105, (1989); Frisch R., Theory of Production, (1965); Gander J.P., Academic research and teaching productivities: A case study, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 49, 3, pp. 311-319, (1995); Getz M., Siegfried J.J., Cost inflation, Economic Challenges in Higher Education, pp. 261-285, (1991); Griliches Z., Issues in assessing the contribution of R&D to productivity growth, Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 1, pp. 92-116, (1979); Hagedorn L.S., Wage equity and female faculty job satisfaction: The role of wage differentials in a job satisfaction causal model, Research in Higher Education, 37, 5, pp. 569-598, (1996); Hansen W.L., Weisbrod B.A., Straus R.P., Modeling the earnings and research productivity of academic economists, Journal of Political Economy, 86, 4, pp. 729-741, (1978); Helmreich R.L., Spence J.F., Lucker W.E., Matthews K.A., Making it in academic psychology: Demographic and personality correlates of attainment, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 5, pp. 896-908, (1980); Jaffe A.B., Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms' patents, profits, and market value, American Economic Review, 76, 5, pp. 984-1001, (1986); Joreskog K.G., Sorbom D., Recent developments in structural equation modeling, Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 4, pp. 404-416, (1982); Joreskog K.G., Sorbom D., LiSREL 7: User's Reference Guide, (1989); Katz D.A., Faculty salaries, promotions, and productivity at a large university, American Economic Review, 63, 3, pp. 469-577, (1973); Levey B.A., Gentile N.O., Jolly H.P., Beaty H.N., Levey G.S., Comparing research activities of women and men faculty in departmerits of internal medicine, Academic Medicine, 65, 2, pp. 102-106, (1990); Lindley J.T., Fish M., Jackson J., Gender differences in salaries: An application to academe, Southern Economic Journal, 59, 2, pp. 241-259, (1992); Science and Engineering Indicators - 1991, 10th Ed., (1991); Olsen D., Maple S.A., Gender differences among faculty at a research university: Myths and realities, Initiatives, 55, 4, pp. 33-42, (1992); Olson J.E., Institutional and technical constraints on faculty gross productivity in American doctoral universities, Research in Higher Education, 35, 5, pp. 549-567, (1994); Over R., Research productivity and impact of male and female psychologists, American Psychologists, 37, 1, pp. 24-31, (1982); Pakes A., Griliches Z., Patents and R&D at the firm level: A first look, R&D, Patents, and Productivity, pp. 55-72, (1984); Pascarella E.T., Terenzini P.T., How College Affects Students, (1991); Persell C.H., Gender rewards and research in education, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 8, 1, pp. 34-47, (1983); Renaud R.D., Murray H.G., Aging, personality, and teaching effectiveness in academic psychologists, Research in Higher Education, 37, 3, pp. 323-340, (1996); Rodgers R.C., Maranto C.L., Causal models of publishing productivity in psychology, Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 4, pp. 636-649, (1989); Rong X.L., Grant L., Ward K.B., Productivity of women scholars and gender researchers: Is funding a factor?, American Sociologists, 20, 1, pp. 95-100, (1989); Solmon L.C., The definition and impact of college quality, Does College Matter?: Some Evidence on the Importance of Higher Education, pp. 77-105, (1973); Vinod H.D., Econometrics of joint production, Econometrica, 36, 2, pp. 322-336, (1968); Walters C.G., Fry E.H., Chaisson B.D., Women scholars: Closing the publication gap, Research in Higher Education, 31, 4, pp. 355-367, (1990)
Nơi xuất bản
Kluwer Academic/Human Sciences Press Inc.
Hình thức xuất bản
Article
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus