Honoring exemplary teaching in the liberal arts institution
Zahorski K.J.
1996
New Directions for Teaching and Learning
6
10.1002/tl.37219966515
Liberal arts institutions have long been known for seeing teaching as a primary mission. Their methods for recognizing exemplary teaching are discussed in this chapter. © 1996 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company.
Bauman M.G., Liberal Arts for the Twenty-First Century, Journal of Higher Education, 58, 1, pp. 38-45, (1987); Faculty Manual, (1994); Bevan J.M., It Pays to Reward Good Teachers, AGB Reports, 23, 2, pp. 8-14, (1981); Centra J.A., Faculty Development Practices in U.S. Colleges and Universities, (1976); Eble K.E., The Aims of College Teaching, (1983); Edgerton R., The Re-Examination of Faculty Priorities, Change, 25, 4, pp. 10-25, (1993); Frayer D., Crist, Fleming, Manner and Newton Win Creative Teaching Awards, Teaching at Duquesne, 6, 2, pp. 1-2, (1995); Grasha A.F., Faculty Development in the Context of Organizational, Interpersonal, and Personal Constraints, California Journal of Teacher Education, 4, 1, pp. 41-55, (1977); Office of Faculty and Program Development; Smith H., Walvoord B., Certifying Teaching Excellence: An Alternative Paradigm to the Teaching Award, AAHE Bulletin, 46, 2, pp. 3-5, (1993); The Josiah Meigs Awards for Excellence in Teaching; Wergin J., Departmental Awards, Change, 25, 4, (1993); Weimer M., Improving College Teaching: Strategies for Developing Instructional Effectiveness, (1990); Zahorski K.J., St. Norbert College Office of Faculty Development Ninth Annual Report: 1993-94, (1994)
Article
Scopus