CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Rape myths and religiosity

Tác giả

Freymeyer R.H.

Năm xuất bản

1997

Source title

Sociological Spectrum

Số trích dẫn

DOI

10.1080/02732173.1997.9982179

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0031516556&doi=10.1080%2f02732173.1997.9982179&partnerID=40&md5=e75ea02a8bf9f309fe386d8e4e14f09d

Tóm tắt

Many misconceptions about rape exist. This research used data from a random sample of students at a small, church-related liberal arts college to examine how religiosity relates to several common rape myths. Among the myths considered are whether a woman who is raped has only herself to blame if she is provocatively dressed, has a history of promiscuous behavior, or has been drinking alcoholic beverages. Findings suggest sex and religiosity interact to affect rape myth acceptance: Religiosity relates to rape myth acceptance only after controlling for sex. More religious men thought that women must accept some blame for their rapes, whereas religious women were less likely to blame the victim. Explanations for this finding include the sexual difference both in rape myth acceptance and in religious beliefs. © 1997 Taylor & Francis.

Từ khóa

Tài liệu tham khảo

Burt M., Cultural Myths and Support for Rape, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, pp. 217-230, (1980); Feild H.S., Attitudes Toward Rape: A Comparative Analysis of Police, Rapists, Crisis Counselors, and Citizens, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, pp. 156-179, (1978); Finlay B., Right to Life vs. The Right to Die: Some Correlates of Euthanasia Attitudes, Sociology and Social Research, 69, pp. 548-560, (1985); Giacopassi D.J., Thomas Dull R., Gender and Racial Differences in the Acceptance of Rape Myths Within a College Population, Sex Roles, 15, pp. 63-75, (1986); Gilmartin-Zena P., Gender Differences in Students’ Attitudes Toward Rape, Sociological Focus, 21, pp. 279-292, (1988); Gray N.B., Ralileo G.J., David Johnson G., Explaining Rape Victim Blame: A Test of Attribution Theory, Sociological Spectrum, 13, pp. 377-392, (1993); Greeley A., Religious Change in America, (1989); Hunter J.D., Sargeant K.H., Religion, Women, and the Transformation of Public Culture, Social Research, 60, pp. 545-570, (1993); Jelen T.B., Wilcox C., The Effects of Religious Self-Identification on Support for the New Christian Right: An Analysis of Political Activists, The Social Science Journal, 29, pp. 199-210, (1992); Johnson B.E., Kuck D.L., Schander R.R., The Association Between Traditional Gender Role Beliefs and Acceptance of Rape Myths Among College Students, Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southern Sociological Society, (1996); Johnson G.D., Palileo G.J., Gray N.B., ‘Date Rape’ on a Southern Campus: Reports from 1991, Sociology and Social Research, 76, pp. 37-44, (1992); Kalof L., Rape-Supportive Attitudes and Sexual Victimization Experiences of Sorority and Nonsorority Women, Sex Roles, 29, pp. 767-780, (1993); Lonsway K.A., Fitzgerald L.F., Rape Myths in Review, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, pp. 133-164, (1994); Lonsway K.A., Fitzgerald L.F., Attitudinal Antecedents of Rape Myth Acceptance: A Theoretical and Empirical Reexamination, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, pp. 704-711, (1995); Martin P.Y., Hummer R.A., Fraternities and Rape on Campus, Gender and Society, 3, pp. 457-473, (1989); Mueller C., In Search of a Constituency for the ‘New Religious Right.’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, pp. 213-229, (1983); Renzetti C., Curran D., Women, Men, and Society, (1995); Szymanski L.A., Devlin A.S., Chrisler J.C., Vyse S.A., Gender Role and Attitudes Toward Rape in Male and Female College Students, Sex Roles, 29, pp. 37-57, (1993); Wylie L., Forest J., Religious Fundamentalism, Right- Wing Authoritarianism and Prejudice, Psychological Reports, 71, pp. 1291-1298, (1992)