CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

The student divestment movement in the United States and tactical diffusion: The shantytown protest

Tác giả

Soule S.A.

Năm xuất bản

1997

Source title

Social Forces

Số trích dẫn

264

DOI

10.1093/sf/75.3.855

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0031411582&doi=10.1093%2fsf%2f75.3.855&partnerID=40&md5=c6c1de20ca3638b3543787b0d8bce12f

Tóm tắt

A recent trend in the literature on social movements is the focus on how social movement organizations influence not only their challengers but also other social movement organizations, both in other movements and movements in different countries. This article shows how diffusion theory helps us to better understand this process by specifying ways in which social movement organizations within the same movement may influence one another through indirect network ties. More specifically, I show that a new tactic of protest, the shantytown, spread rapidly among U.S. campuses between 1985 and 1990. Recent advances in the modeling of diffusion in an event history framework allow me to test for the diffusion of this innovative strategy of protest among certain groupings of colleges and universities. Specifically, my results indicate that the tactic spread among colleges and universities with similar size endowments, of roughly the same level of prestige, and of the same institutional type. My analysis also indicates that high prestige, liberal arts colleges with smaller numbers of African American students had higher rates of shantytown protest.

Từ khóa

Tài liệu tham khảo

Apartheid's Violence, (1990); Birnbach L., College Book, (1984); Blau P.M., Slaughter E.L., Institutional conditions and student demonstrations, Social Problems, 18, pp. 474-487, (1971); Bloom J.M., Class, Race, and the Civil Rights Movement, (1987); Boyer E.L., A Classification of Institutions of Higher Education: A Carnegie Foundation Technical Report, (1987); Burt R.S., Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence, American Journal of Sociology., 92, pp. 1287-1335, (1987); New Students and New Places, (1971); Christian Science Monitor, (1985); Coleman J.S., Katz E., Menzel H., Medical Innovation, (1966); Eckberg D.L., The physicians' anti-abortion campaign and the social bases of moral reform participation, Social Forces, 67, pp. 378-397, (1988); Feuer L.S., The Conflict of Generations: The Character and Significance of Student Movements, (1969); Freeman J., The origins of the women's liberation movement, American Journal of Sociology, 78, pp. 792-811, (1973); Gamson W.A., The Strategy of Social Protest. 2d Ed., (1989); Gould R., Multiple networks and mobilization in the Paris Commune, 1871, American Sociological Review, 56, pp. 716-729, (1991); Gourman J., The Gourman Report: A Rating of Undergraduate Programs in American and International Universities, (1989); The Gourman Report: A Rating of Undergraduate Programs in American and International Universities, (1985); Greve H., Jumping ship: The diffusion of strategy abandonment, Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, pp. 444-473, (1995); Greve H.R., Strang D., Tuma N.B., Specification and estimation of heterogeneous diffusion models, Sociological Methodology, pp. 377-420, (1995); Guigni M.G., The Rise of New Social Movements in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis, (1995); Hagerstrand T., Innovation Diffusion As a Spatial Process, (1953); Hedstrom P., Contagious collectivities: On the spatial diffusion of Swedish Trade Unions, 1890-1940, American Journal of Sociology, 99, pp. 1157-1179, (1994); Higher Education General Information Survey: Fall Enrollment and Compliance Report of Institutions of Higher Education (HEGIS XI), (1976); Higher Education General Information Survey: Fall Enrollment and Compliance Report of Institutions of Higher Education (HEGIS XV), (1980); Higher Education General Information Survey: Fall Enrollment and Compliance Report of Institutions of Higher Education (HEGIS XX), (1985); Higher Education General Information Survey: Financial Statistics of Institutions of Higher Learning (HEGIS XXI.), (1985); Higher Education General Information Survey: Financial Statistics of Institutions of Higher Learning (HEGIS FY), (1980); Higher Education General Information Survey: Financial Statistics of Institutions of Higher Learning (HEGIS FY), (1976); Hirsch E.L., Sacrifice for the cause: Group processes, recruitment, and commitment in a student social movement, American Sociological Review, 55, pp. 243-267, (1990); Holden R.T., The contagiousness of aircraft hijacking, American Journal of Sociology, 91, pp. 874-904, (1986); Jackson J.L., The symbolic politics of divestment: Protest effectiveness on US. College and University Campuses, NEH Seminar Symposium, (1992); Kalbfleisch J.D., Prentice R.L., The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data, (1980); Kielbowicz R.B., Scherer C., The role of the press in the dynamics of social movements, Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, 9, pp. 71-96, (1986); Klandermans B., The social construction of protest and multiorganizational fields, Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, (1992); Lacey M., Cornell Daily Sun, (1985); Lipset S.M., American Student Activism, The University and Revolution, (1969); Rebellion in the University, (1971); Loeb P.R., Generation at a Crossroads: Apathy and Action on the American Campus, (1994); Lorrain F., White H.C., Structural equivalence of individuals in networks, Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1, pp. 49-80, (1971); McAdam D., Tactical innovation and the pace of insurgency, American Sociological Review, 48, pp. 735-754, (1983); Recruitment to high-risk activism: The case of freedom summer, American Journal of Sociology, 92, pp. 64-90, (1986); Freedom Summer, (1988); McAdam D., Rucht D., Cross national diffusion of social movement ideas, The Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science, 528, pp. 56-74, (1993); McCarthy J.D., Zald M.N., Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory, American Journal of Sociology, 82, pp. 1212-1241, (1977); Meyer D.S., Whittier N., Social movement spillover, Social Problems, 41, pp. 277-298, (1994); Newsweek Magazine, (1985); Oberschall A., The 1960 sit-ins: Protest diffusion and movement take-off, Research In Social Movements, Conflict, and Change, 11, pp. 31-53, (1989); Olzak S., The Dynamics of Ethnic Competition and Conflict, (1992); Olzak S., Shanahan S., West E., School desegregation, interracial exposure, and antibusing activity in contemporary Urban America, American Journal of Sociology, 100, pp. 196-241, (1994); Orbell J., Protest participation among Southern Negro College Students, The Black Revolt, (1971); Paige J.M., Agrarian Revolution: Social Movements and Export Agriculture in the Under-developed World, (1975); Peterson's Guides to Four Year Colleges, (1985); Peterson's Guides to Four Year Colleges. 18th Ed, (1988); Pitcher B., Hamblin R., Miller J., The diffusion of collective violence, American Sociological Review, 43, pp. 23-35, (1978); Postal L., Cornell Daily Sun, (1985); Rogers E.M., Diffusion of Innovations, (1983); Sherkat D., Blocker T.J., The political development of Sixties' Activists: Identifying the influence of class, gender, and socialization on protest participation, Social Forces, 72, pp. 821-842, (1994); Snow D.A., Benford R.D., Master frames and cycles of protest, Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, (1992); Soule S.A., Tarrow S., Acting collectively, 1847-1849: How repertoires of collective action changed and where it happened, Annual Meeting of the Social Science History Association, (1991); Soule S.A., The Student Anti-Apartheid Movement in the United States: Diffusion of Tactics and Policy Reform, (1995); Strang D., Adding social structure to diffusion models: An event history framework, Sociological Methods and Research, 9, pp. 324-353, (1991); Strang D., Meyer J.W., Institutional conditions for diffusion, Theory and Society, 22, pp. 487-511, (1993); Strang D., Tuma N., Spatial and Temporal Heterogeneity in Diffusion, (1992); Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in diffusion, American Journal of Sociology, 99, pp. 614-639, (1993); Tarrow S., Struggle, Politics, and Reform: Collective Action, Social Movements, and Cycles of Protest, (1989); Modular collective action and the rise of the social movement: Why the French Revolution was not enough, Politics and Society, 21, pp. 69-90, (1993); Power in Movement, (1994); Tilly C., From Mobilization to Revolution, (1978); The Contentious French, (1986); Contentious repertoires in Britain, 1758-1824, Social Science History, 17, pp. 253-280, (1993); Popular Contention in Great Britain, 1758-1834, (1995); Tuma N.B., Hannan M.T., Social Dynamics: Models and Methods, (1984); VanDyke N., Structural Determinants of Student Activism: The Role of Activist Networks and Tradition, (1994); Vellela T., New Voices: Student Activism in the '80's and '90's, (1988); Weiner J., Divestment report card; students, stocks, and shanties: Colleges divest from South Africa, The Nation, 11, (1986); Zolberg A., Moments and madness, Politics and Society, 2, pp. 183-207, (1972)

Nơi xuất bản

University of North Carolina Press

Hình thức xuất bản

Article

Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus