The curriculum shadow
Uhrmacher P.B.
1997
Curriculum Inquiry
15
10.1080/03626784.1997.11075494
This article presumes that the curriculum field needs to be semantically rich so that practitioners and researchers may enhance their educational perceptions. Language enables us to communicate and it helps us to "see" what otherwise may go unnoticed. Hence, this article propounds a new term, the "curriculum shadow," to refer more precisely to aspects sometimes viewed as what is commonly called the "downsides" of curricula. The new term reveals how every discrete curriculum has a shadow that can be found by reflecting on what the curriculum privileges and what it disdains. What the curriculum apparently disdains could actually augment the curriculum, and may, in fact, be vital in creating a balanced curricular unit. This article begins with an overview of some critical Jungian concepts, and then distinguishes the curriculum shadow from the hidden and the null curricula. The idea of the curriculum shadow is then applied to the teaching of science, liberal arts, and reading. My analysis suggests that in thinking about science curricula, educators ought to consider including such processes as feeling, fantasizing, intuition, and dreaming to help students understand how science is really done. In discussing the liberal arts curricula, I use Noddings's ideas to emphasize that caring ought not be neglected, and I also suggest what one can do when one discovers a curriculum shadow. Finally, I point out that even approaches to teaching reading can have shadows. For instance, in our rush to help children learn to read, some approaches may be "petrifying" children's thinking. © 1997 by The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
Adler M.J., The Paideia Proposal: An Educational Manifesto, (1982); Arnheim R., Thoughts on Art Education, (1989); Bowers C.A., Flinders D.J., Responsive Teaching: An Ecological Approach to Classroom Patterns of Language, Culture, and Thought, (1990); Bruner J., The Process of Education, (1961); Culler J., On Deconstructionism, (1982); Dewey J., Democracy and Education, (1916); Eisner E.W., The Enlightened Eye: Qualitative Inquiry and the Enhancement of Educational Practice, (1991); Eisner E.W., The Educational Imagination: on the Design and Evaluation of School Programs. 3d Ed., (1994); Flinders D.J., Noddings N., Thornton S.J., The null curriculum: Its theoretical basis and practical implications, Curriculum Inquiry, 16, 1, pp. 33-42, (1986); Frankfort H., Frankfort H.A., Wilson J.A., Jacobsen T., Irwin W.A., The Intellectual Adventure of Ancient Man, (1946); Fuchs E., Havighurst R.J., To Live on This Earth: American Indian Education, (1973); Gadamer H.-G., Truth and Method, (1975); Gallas K., Art as epistemology: Enabling children to know what they know, Harvard Educational Review, 1, 61, pp. 40-50, (1991); Hall C.S., Nordby V.J., A Primer of Jungian Psychology, (1973); Jacobi J., The Psychology of C. G. Jung, (1973); Handbook of Research on Curriculum, (1992); Man and His Symbols, (1964); Kast V., The Dynamics of Symbols: Fundamentals of Jungian Psychotherapy, (1992); Keller E., A Feeling for the Organism, (1983); McCormack A.J., Trends and issues in science curriculum, Science Curriculum Resource Handbook: A Practical Guide for K-12 Science Curriculum, pp. 16-41, (1992); Noddings N., The Challenge to Care in Schools, (1992); Nakagiri G., Topics in the science curriculum, grades K-12, Science Curriculum Resource Handbook: A Practical Guide for K-12 Science Curriculum, pp. 72-90, (1992); Philp H.L., Jung and the Problem of Evil, (1959); The Essential Jung, (1983); Tanner D., Tanner L.N., Curriculum Development: Theory into Practice. 2d Ed., (1980); Uhrmacher P.B., Waldorf Schools Marching Quietly Unheard, (1991); Vallance E., Hiding the hidden curriculum: An interpretation of the language of justification in nineteenth-century educational reform, The Hidden Curriculum and Moral Education, pp. 9-27, (1983); Zais R.S., Curriculum: Principles and Foundations, (1976)
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Article
Scopus