Does the curriculum fit the career? Some conclusions from a survey of graduates of a degree program in professional and technical communication
Coon A.C.; Scanlon P.M.
1997
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
12
10.2190/TL92-LKAT-C963-88WP
Recent graduates of a degree program in professional and technical communication were surveyed to identify their current employment, their attitudes toward their academic preparation, and the professional courses they found most helpful. The history and curriculum of Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT's) eleven-year-old program in Professional and Technical Communication (PTC) is described, as well as the program's "professional core," its Liberal Arts core, and its cooperative education requirement. The survey was modeled after a previous survey the authors conducted with members of the Society for Technical Communication. The results of both surveys emphasized the basics of writing and computer skills. The degree program alumni also expressed the desire for a "more practical" curriculum that placed less emphasis on theory. Anecdotal responses from the alumni provided a unique view of the field through the eyes of its newest practitioners.
Rainey K.T., Staples K.E., Toward 2000: Education, the Society, and the Profession, Technical Communication, 42, 4, pp. 543-544, (1995); Carliner S., Finding a Common Ground: What STC Is, and Should Be, Doing to Advance Education in Information Design and Development, Technical Communication, 42, 4, pp. 546-554, (1995); Applewhite L.B., Partners for Teaching and Learning in Technical Communication, Technical Communication, 42, 4, pp. 624-627, (1995); Bosley D.S., Collaborative Partnerships: Academia and Industry Working Together, Technical Communication, 42, 4, pp. 611-619, (1995); Barchilon M.G., Kelley D.G., A Flexible Technical Communication Education Model for the Year 2000, Technical Communication, 42, 4, pp. 590-598, (1995); Little S.B., Preparing the Technical Communicator of the Future, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 33, 1, pp. 28-31, (1990); Jenkins S., Jordan M.K., Weiland P.O., The Role of Writing in Graduate Engineering Education: A Survey of Faculty Beliefs and Practices, English for Specific Purposes, 12, 1, pp. 51-67, (1993); Southard S.G., Reaves R., Tough Questions and Straight Answers: Educating Technical Communicators in the Next Decade, Technical Communication, 42, 4, pp. 555-565, (1995); Scanlon P.M., Coon A.C., Attitudes of Professional Technical Communicators Regarding the Content of an Undergraduate Course in Technical Communication: A Survey, Technical Communication, 41, 3, pp. 439-446, (1994); Green M.M., Nolan T.D., A Systematic Analysis of the Technical Communicator's Job: A Guide for Educators, Technical Communication, 31, 4, pp. 9-12, (1984); Hayhoe G.F., Stohrer F., Kunz L.D., Southard S.G., The Evolution of Academic Programs in Technical Communication, Technical Communication, 41, 1, pp. 14-19, (1994); Feinberg S., Goldman J., Content for a Course in Technical Communication: Results of a Survey, Technical Communication, 32, 2, pp. 21-25, (1985); Kalmbach J.R., Jobst J.W., Meese G.P.E., Education and Practice: A Survey of Graduates of a Technical Communication Program, Technical Communication, 33, 1, pp. 21-26, (1986)
Baywood Publishing Co. Inc.
Article
Scopus