CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
"He drew a circle that shut me out": Assimilation, indoctrination, and the paradox of a liberal education
Tác giả
Stolzenberg N.M.
Năm xuất bản
1993
Source title
Harvard Law Review
Số trích dẫn
141
DOI
10.2307/1341657
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
Jurists and scholars have long misapprehended or avoided a complaint by fundamentalist Christians and other insular communities that "liberal" Western education violates their cultural integrity by exposing their children to alternative lifestyles. In essence, they claim that rationalist, subjectivist education indoctrinates them in tolerance. Courts have generally either ignored this critique or responded that "mere" exposure cannot constitute indoctrination because it leaves the exposed free, perhaps freer, to choose her own way of life. But this response is inadequate, for it is exactly this intellectual freedom to pick one's own lifestyle that the fundamentalists see as an injurious violation of free exercise. In this Article, Professor Stolzenberg exposes the inability of our traditional philosophical tools to deal with our society's paradoxical intolerance of the intolerant. Through an analysis of Mozert v. Hawkins County Public Schools, Professor Stolzenberg traces the evolution of Christian fundamentalism to demonstrate that the fundamentalists' claim - however foreign to mainstream scholars - is neither hasty nor new. Indeed, an almost identical critique of emerging Western rationalism sparked the fundamentalist movement almost a century ago. Having explained the necessity of taking this claim seriously, Professor Stolzenberg then explores the justification offered by civic republican scholars and jurists for indoctrination in tolerance and concludes that neither this tradition nor the communitarian tradition adequately answers the fundamentalist complaint because both contain within them the same commitment to subjectivism that paralyzes the liberal response.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Black Neighborhoods Becoming Black Cities: Growing Empowerment, Local Control, and the Implications of Being Darker than Brown, Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., 23, (1988); Matsuda M.J., Public Response to Racist Speech: Considering the Victim's Story, Mich. L. Rev., 87, (1989); Crenshaw K.W., Race, Reform, and Retrenchment: Transformation and Legitimation in Antidiscrimination Law, Harv. L. Rev., 101, (1988); Lawrence III C.R., The Id, the Ego, and Equal Protection: Reckoning with Unconscious Racism, Stan. L. Rev., 39, (1987); Williams P.J., Alchemical Notes: Reconstructing Ideals from Deconstructed Rights, Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev., 22, (1987); Minow M., Making All the Difference, (1990); Taub N., Williams W.W., Will Equality Require More than Assimilation, Accommodation or Separation from the Existing Social Structure?, Rutgers L. Rev., 37, (1985); Young I.M., Polity and Group Difference: A Critique of the Ideal of Universal Citizenship, Ethics, 99, (1989); Post R.C., Cultural Heterogeneity and Law: Pornography, Blasphemy, and the First Amendment, Cal. L. Rev., 76, (1988); Wolff R.P., Moore Jr. B., Marcuse H., A Critique of Pure Tolerance, (1965); McClure K.M., Difference, Diversity, and the Limits of Toleration, Pol. Theory, 18, (1990); Minow M., Putting Up and Putting Down: Tolerance Reconsidered, Comparative Constitutional Federalism, (1990); Markham E., Outwitted, The Best Loved Poems of the American People, (1936); Galanter M., Religious Freedoms in the United States: A Turning Point?, Wis. L. Rev., 1966; Van Geel T., The Search for Constitutional Limits on Governmental Authority to Inculcate Youth, Tex. L. Rev., 62, (1983); Mendes-Flohr P., Divided Passions: Jewish Intellectuals and the Experience of Modernity, (1991); Dent Jr. G.W., Religious Children, Secular Schools, S. Cal. L. Rev., 61, (1988); Ingber S., Religion or Ideology: A Needed Clarification of the Religion Clauses, Stan. L. Rev, 41, (1989); Strossen N., Secular Humanism" and "Scientific Creationism": Proposed Standards for Reviewing Curricular Decisions Affecting Students' Religious Freedom, Ohio St. L.J., 47, (1986); Schlosser J., Secular Humanism in Public School Textbooks: Thou Shalt Have No Other God (Except Thyself), Notre Dame L. Rev., 63, (1988); Mill J.S., On Liberty, pp. 176-177, (1974); Stewart M., The First Amendment, the Public Schools, and the Inculcation of Community Values, J. L. & Educ., 18, (1989); Lupu I.C., Where Rights Begin: The Problem of Burdens on the Free Exercise of Religion, Harv. L. Rev., 102, (1989); Richards D.A.J., Toleration and the Constitution, pp. 150-155, (1986); Rebell M.A., Schools, Values, and the Courts, Yale L. & Pol'y Rev., 7, 31, (1989); Tribe L.H., American Constitutional Law, (1988); Aleinikoff T.A., Constitutional Law in the Age of Balancing, Yale L.J., 96, (1987); Clendinen D., Fundamentalist Parents Put Textbooks on Trial, N.Y. Times, (1986); The Diary of Anne Frank; Silence M., A Denial of Religious Freedom?, Nat'l L.J., (1986); Beck M., A Reprise of Scopes, Nesweek, pp. 18-19, (1986); Treadwell D., Christian Group's School Text Trial May Set Precedent, L.A. Times, (1986); McAfee C., Mother Praises God for Judge's Decision, UPI, (1983); Epstein R., The Supreme Court, 1987 Term - Foreword: Unconstitutional Conditions, State Power, and the Limits of Consent, Harv. L. Rev., 102, (1988); Sullivan K.M., Unconstitutional Conditions, Harv. L. Rev., 102, (1989); Hirsley M., Bible, Science Hold Tennessee Rematch, Chi. Trib., (1986); Parents Charge Textbooks Equate Humans, Animals, L. A. Times, (1986); Maltby J., Plaintiffs Rest in Textbooks Trial, UPI, (1986); Maltby J., Scopes II' Half Over; Parents Establish They're Offended, UPI, (1986); Fundamentalists' Witness Tells of Textbooks' Harm, L.A. Times, (1986); Parents Charge Textbooks Equate Humans, Animals; Vitz P., Anti-Christian' Passages in Texts Could Embarrass Students, Prof. Tells Court, L.A. Times, (1986); McRary A., Domestic News, UPI, (1986); Mann J., Religious Readings, Wash. Post, (1986); MacAskill E., Schoolbooks under Fire in Bible Belt Court, Wash. Post, (1986); Burns M., Tennessee Textbook Case Goes before Appeals Court, UPI, (1987); Parents Charge Textbooks Equate Humans, Animals; Teacher Tells Problems of Using Two Sets of Texts in Same Class, L. A. Times, (1986); Dart J., Victors in Textbook Trial Look to Alabama Case for Another Triumph, L.A. Times, (1986); Slaying Dragons in Tennessee, N. Y. Times, (1986); Fundamentalists' Witness Tells of Textbooks' Harm; Mackinnon C.A., Feminism Unmodified, pp. 163-197, (1987); A Communitarian Defense of Group Libel Laws, Harv. L. Rev., 104, (1988); Marshall W., The Concept of Offensiveness in Establishment and Free Exercise Jurisprudence, Ind. L.J., 66, (1991); Post R.C., Racist Speech, Democracy, and the First Amendment, Wm. & Mary L. Rev., 32, 5, (1991); Goret R.R., Dancing to Music: An Interpretation of Mutuality, KY. L.J., 80, (1992); Williams D.C., Williams S.H., Volitionalism and Religious Liberty, Cornell L. Rev., 76, (1991); Danzig R., Justice Frankfurter's Opinions in the Flag Salute Cases: Blending Logic and Psychologic in Constitutional Decisionmaking, Stan. L. Rev., 36, (1984); Stolzenberg N.M., Jews, Jurisdiction and Judicial Review: Un-Covering the Tradition of Jewish "Dissimilation, Conference on Jews and the Law in the United States, pp. 7-8, (1991); Rubenfeld J., The Right of Privacy, Harv. L. Rev., 102, (1989); Garet R.R., Communality and Existence: The Rights of Groups, S. Cal. L. Rev., 56, (1983); Marshall W.P., Sloving the Free Exercise Dilemma: Free Exercise as Expression, Minn. L. Rev., 67, (1983); Gutmann A.M.Y., Democratic Education, (1987); Bartlett K.T., Re-Expressing Parenthood, Yale L.J., 98, (1988); Colb S.F., Words that Deny, Devalue, and Punish: Judicial Responses to Fetus-Envy?, B.U. L. Rev., 72, (1992); McRary A., Domestic News, UPI, (1986); Lupu I.C., Home Education, Religious Liberty, and the Separation of Powers, B.U. L. Rev., 67, (1987); Freed E.C., Secular Humanism, the Establishment Clause, and Public Education, N.Y.U. L. Rev., 61, (1980); Slaying Dragons in Tennessee; Jim and Pat Cook. Jim Cooks First, N.Y. Times, (1986); Heinz D., The Struggle to Define America, The New Christian Right: Mobilization and Legitimation, (1983); Fackre G., The Religious Right and Christian Faith, (1982); Hunter J.D., The Liberal Reaction, The New Christian Right: Mobilization and Legitimation; Moore J.N., Fundamentalism and the Creation-Evolution Debate, Fundamentalism Today: What Makes It so Attractive?, (1984); Shupe A., Bromley D.G., Interpreting the New Christian Right: A Commentary on the Substance and Process of Knowledge Creation, New Christian Politics, (1984); Rausch D.A., Fundamentalist Origins, Fundamentalism Today: What Makes It so Attractive?; Hammon P.E., Foreword, New Christian Politics; Branick V.P., The Attractiveness of Fundamentalism, Fundamentalism Today: What Makes It so Attractive?; Capps W.H., The New Religious Right, (1990); Towne E.A., Fundamentalism's Theological Challenge to the Churches, Fundamentalism Today: What Makes It so Attractive?; Cross W.R., The Burned-over District, pp. 18-19, (1981); Tyler A.F., Freedom's Ferment, pp. 27-28, (1962); Hayes J.H., An Introduction to Old Testament Study, (1979); Van Harvey, The Historian and the Believer, pp. 3-35, (1966); Chandler R.C., The Wicked Shall Not Bear Rule: The Fundamentalist Heritage of the New Christian Right, New Christian Politics; Speer J.A., The New Christian Right and Its Parent Company: A Study in Political Contrasts, New Christian Politics; D'Souza D., Falwell before the Millennium, (1984); D'Souza, The Fundamentals: A Testimony to Truth; Simpson J.H., Moral Issues and Status Politics, The New Christian Right; Little D., Religion, Order and Law, pp. 54-56, (1984); Cover R.M., The Supreme Court, 1982 Term - Foreword: Nomos and Narrative, Harv. L. Rev., 97, (1983); Liebman R.C., The Making of the New Christian Right, The New Christian Right; Wuthnow R., The Political Rebirth of American Evangelicals, The New Christian Right; Martin W., A Prophet with Honor, pp. 218-219, (1991); Machen J.G., Christianity and Liberalism, (1923); Schaeffer F.A., A Christian Manifesto, (1982); A Humanist Manifesto, The Humanist, (1973); 2 Sides Wrap Up Arguments over Textbooks in Tennessee, N.Y. Times, (1986); Simon S.B., Howe L.W., Kirschenbaum H., Values Clarification: A Handbook of Practical Strategies for Teachers and Students, pp. 13-22, (1972); Isikoff M., The Robertson Right and the Grandest Conspiracy, Wash. Post, (1992); Fitzgerald F., A Reporter at Large: A Disciplined, Changing Army, New Yorker, (1981); Fitzgerald F., Cities on a Hill, pp. 14-15, (1981); Jorstad E., The Politics of Moralism: The New Christian Right in American Life, pp. 17-18, (1981); Shupe A., Stacey W., The Moral Majority Constituency, The New Christian Right: Mobilization and Legitimization; Himmelstein J.L., The New Right, The New Christian Right: Mobilization and Legitimation; Hilts P.J., Creation vs. Evolution: Battle Resumes in Public Schools, Wash. Post, (1980); Werner L.M., Religion Lack in Texts Cited, N. Y. Times, (1986); Vobejda B., Conflict Sharpens over Nation's Textbooks, Wash. Post, (1986); Raz J., Facing Diversity: The Case of Epistemic Abstinence, Phil. & Pub. Aff., 19, (1990); Raz, Facing Diversity; Raz J., Liberalism, Skepticism, and Democracy, Iowa L. Rev., 74, (1989); Raz, Liberalism; Brann E.T.H., Paradoxes of Education in a Republic, pp. 79-81, (1979); Nietzsche F., The Use and Abuse of History, (1957); Burdens on the Free Exercise of Religion: A Subjective Alternative, Harv. L. Rev., 102, (1989); Dow D.R., Toward a Theory of the Establishment Clause, UMKC L. Rev., 56, (1988); Locke J., A Letter Concerning Toleration, The Second Treatise of Civil Government and a Letter Concerning Toleration, (1937); Carter S.L., Evolutionism, Creationism," Treating Religion as a Hobby, Duke L.J., 1987; Fish S., Liberalism Doesn't Exist, Duke L.J., 1987; Raz, Liberalism, pp. 762-763; Dworkin R., The Forum of Principle, N.Y.U. L. Rev., 56, (1981); Perry M.J., The Authority of Text, Tradition, and Reason: A Theory of Constitutional "Interpretation,, S. Cal. L. Rev., 58, (1985); Raz J., The Morality of Freedom, pp. 148-157, (1986); Nedelsky J., Law, Boundaries, and the Bounded Self, Representations, 30, (1990); Iannaccone L.R., Sacrifice and Stigma: Reducing Free-riding in Cults, Communes, and Other Collectives, J. Pol. Econ., 100, (1992); Lott Jr. J.R., An Explanation for Public Provision of Schooling: The Importance of Indoctrination, J. L. & Econ., 33, (1990); Macinyre A., After Virtue 2d Ed., (1984); Rorty R., Consequences of Pragmatism, (1982); Rorty R., Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, (1979); Sandel M.J., Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, (1982); Liberalism and Its Critics, (1984); Taylor C., Hegel and Modern Society, (1979); Barber B.R., Strong Democracy, (1984); Unger R.M., Knowledge & Politics, (1975); Walzer M., Spheres of Justice, (1983); Taylor C., Atomism, Powers, Possessions, and Freedom, (1979); Gutmann A., Communitarian Critics of Liberalism, Phil. & Pub. Aff., 14, (1985); Wallach J.R., Liberals, Communitarians, and the Tasks of Political Theory, Pol. Theory, 15, (1987); Sandel M., Justice and the Good, Liberalism and Its Critics; Sullivan K., Rainbow Republicanism, Yale L.J., 97, (1988); Black's Law Dictionary, (1990); Compulsory Education and the Amish, pp. 11-14, (1975); Hostetler J.A., Amish Society, (1980); Guth J.L., The New Christian Right, The New Christian Right: Mobilization and Legitimation; Buetow H.A., Of Singular Benefit, pp. 114-115, (1970); Greeley A.M., Rossi P.H., The Education of Catholic Americans, pp. 2-4, (1966); Carper J.C., The Christian Day School, Religious Schooling in America, (1984); Heller J., Offering Moral Education, Streamlined, 8, (1989); Maxson M.M., The Hidden Cornerstone of American Public Education, Society, Culture, and Schools: The American Approach, (1979); Clifford J., The Predicament of Culturm, pp. 277-346, (1988); Weisbrod C., The Boundaries of Utopia, pp. 34-35, (1980); Resnik J., Dependent Sovereigns: Indian Tribes, States, and the Federal Courts, U. Chi. L. Rev., 56, (1989); Meinecke F., Historicism: The Rise of a New Historical Outlook, (1972); Iggers G., Historicism, Dictionary of the History of Ideas, (1973); Beard C.A., Beard M.R., New Basic History of the United States, (1968); Dienes C.T., Connolly A., When Students Speak: Judicial Review in the Academic Marketplace, Yale L. & Pol'y Rev., 7, (1989); Levin B., Educating Youth for Citizenship: The Conflict between Authority and Individual Rights in the Public School, Yale L.J., 95, (1986); Diamond D.A., The First Amendment and Public Schools: The Case Against Judicial Intervention, Tex. L. Rev., 59, (1981); Yudof M.G., When Government Speaks: Politics, Law and Government Expression in America, pp. 216-218, (1983); Appleby J., Liberalism and Republicanism in the Historical Imagination, (1992); Bailyn B., The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution, pp. 282-284, (1967); Pocock J.G.A., The Machiavellian Moment, pp. 462-467, (1975); Pocock, The Machiavellian Moment; Pocock J.G.A., Virtue, Commerce, and History, pp. 37-50, (1985); Pocock J.G.A., Politics, Language and Time, pp. 96-103, (1971); Pocock, Virtue; Wood G.S., The Creation of the American Republic: 1776-1787, pp. 46-74, (1969); Fallon Jr. R.H., What Is Republicanism, and Is It Worth Reviving?, Harv. L. Rev., 102, (1989); Michelnam F.I., Law's Republic, Yale L.J., 97, (1988); Michelman, Law's Republic; Michelman F.I., The Supreme Court, 1985 Term - Traces of Self-Government, Harv L. Rev., 100, (1986); Michelman, Traces of Self-Government; Sunstein C.R., Interest Groups in American Public Law, Stan. L. Rev., 38, (1985); Tushnet M.V., Anti-Formalism in Recent Constitutional Theory, Mich. L. Rev., 83, (1985); The Republican Civic Tradition, Yale L.J., 97, (1988); Kramnick I., Republican Revisionism Revisited, Am. Hist. Rev., 87, (1982); Herzog D., Some Questions for Republicans, Pol. Theory, 14, (1986); Hirsch H.N., The Threnody of Liberalism: Constitutional Liberty and the Renewal of Community, Pol. Theory, 14, (1986); Political Rights as Political Questions: The Paradox of Luther v. Borden, Harv. L. Rev., 100, 3, (1987); Dailey A.C., Constitutional Privacy and the Just Family, Tul. L. Rev., 67, (1993); Sandel M.J., The Procedural Republic and the Unencumbered Self, Pol. Theory, 12, (1984); Kahn P.W., Community in Contemporary Constitutional Theory, Yale L.J., 99, (1989); Sandel M., Introduction, Liberalism and Its Critics; Gardbaum S.A., Law, Politics, and the Claims of Community, Mich. L. Rev., 90, (1992); Rawls J., Justice as Fairness: Political Not Metaphysical, Phil & Pub. Affairs, 14, pp. 225-228, (1985); Raz, Facing Diversity; Wallach J.R., Liberals, Communitarians, and the Tasks of Political Theory, Pol. Theory, 15, (1987); Raz, Facing Diversity, pp. 5-6; Rawls, Theory of Justice; Marcuse H., Repressive Tolerance, Wolff, Moore & Marcuse; Pocock J.G.A., Virlues, Rights, and Manners, Virtue, pp. 38-39; Michelman F.I., Political Markets and Community Self-Determination: Competing Judicial Models of Local Government Legitimacy, Ind. L.J., 53, (1977); Michelman, Law's Republic; Macedo S., Liberal Virtues, pp. 2-3, (1990); Alexander G.S., Time and Property in the American Republican Legal Culture, N.Y.U. L. REv., 66, (1991); Berlin I., Two Concepts of Liberty, Four Essays on Liberty, (1969); Michelman, Law's Republic, pp. 1503-1505; Michelman, Traces of Self-Government; Hubsch A.W., Education and Self-Government: The Right to Education under State Constitutional Law, J.L. & Educ., 18, (1989); Pocock, The Machiavellian Moment, pp. 338-340; Arendt H., On Revolution, pp. 123-124, (1965); Tushnet M., The Constitution of Religion, Conn. L. Rev., 18, (1986); Kerber L.K., The Republican Mother, Women's America, (1987); Barnard F.M., Vernon R.A., Pluralism, Participation, and Politics: Reflections on the Intermediate Group, Pol. Theory, 3, (1975); Stolzenberg N.M., Myers D.N., Community, Constitution and Culture: The Case of the Jewish Kehilah, Mich. J.L. Reform, 25, (1993); Falwell J., Foreword, Fundamentalism Today: What Makes It so Attractive?; Dewey J., Democracy and Education, pp. 81-99, (1916); Talmon J.L., The Origins of Totalitarian Democracy, pp. 83-86, (1960); Gedicks F.M., Toward a Constitutional Jurisprudence of Religious Group Rights, Wise. L. Rev., 1989; Aleinikoff T.A., Theories of Loss of Citizenship, Mich. L. Rev., 84, (1986); Alexander G.S., Dilemmas of Group Autonomy: Residential Associations and Community, Cornell L. Rev., 75, 8, (1989); Michelman F.I., Possession vs. Distribution in the Constitutional Idea of Property, Iowa L. Rev., 72, (1987); Post R., Tradition, the Self, and Substantive Due Process: A Comment on Michael Sandel, Cal. L. Rev., 77, (1989); Dworkin, Law's Empire, 19, (1986); Tushnet M.V., Following the Rules Laid Down: A Critique of Interpretivism and Neutral Principles, Harv. L. Rev., 96, (1983); Raz, Liberalism; Ackerman B., Why Dialogue?, J. Phil., 86, (1989); Raz, The Morality of Freedom, pp. 110-133; Gardbaum S.A., Why the Liberal State Can Promote Moral Ideas after All, Harv. Rev., 104, (1991); Rousseau J.-J., A Discourse on Political Economy, The Social Contract and Discourses, (1913); MacIntyre A., After Virtue; Sandel M., Liberalism and the Limits of Justice; The Procedural Republic and the Unencumbered Self; Oakeshott M., Political Education, Liberalism and Its Critics; Raz, Facing Diversity; Williams P.J., A Kind of Race Fatigue, N. Y. Times Book Rev., (1990); Pettigrew T., Racially Separate or Together, Black Separatism and Social Reality: Rhetoric and Reason, (1977); Rodriguez R., Hunger of Memory, pp. 34-35, (1982); Minow M., Identities, Yale J.L. & Human, 3, (1991)
Nơi xuất bản
Harvard Law Review Association
Hình thức xuất bản
Article
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus