CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Tenure and promotion: A study of practices by institutional type

Tác giả

Park B.; Riggs R.

Năm xuất bản

1993

Source title

The Journal of Academic Librarianship

Số trích dẫn

DOI

10.1016/0099-1333(93)90074-F

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0002784002&doi=10.1016%2f0099-1333%2893%2990074-F&partnerID=40&md5=e70d033da3b54e1fa7f57273577f74eb

Tóm tắt

A survey sent to research, doctorate-granting, comprehensive, and liberal arts institutions across the U.S. provides information on how evaluation criteria for academic librarians vary among different types of institutions. Job performance is almost universally considered; doctorate-granting and comprehensive universities are more likely to require evidence of publication than are either research or liberal arts institutions. Knowledge of the differences among institutions may help librarians in making career decisions. © 1993.

Từ khóa

Tài liệu tham khảo

U.S. Department of Education, Digest of Education Statistics: 1990, (1991); U.S. Department of Education, Digest of Education Statistics: 1990, (1991); Miller, Academic Promotion and Tenure, Journal of the College and University Personnel Association, 37, pp. 19-25, (1986); Whitman, Weiss, Faculty Evaluation: The Use of Explicit Criteria for Promotion, Retention, and Tenure, (1982); Seldin, How Colleges Evaluate Professors: 1988 vs. 1983, AAHE Bulletin, 41, pp. 3-7, (1989); DeBoer, Culotta, The Academic Librarian and Faculty Status in the 1980's: A Survey of the Literature, College & Research Libraries, 48, pp. 215-223, (1987); Krompart, DiFelice, A Review of Faculty Status Surveys, 1971–1984, Journal of Academic Librarianship, 13, pp. 14-18, (1987); Werrell, Sullivan, Faculty Status for Academic Librarians: A Review of the Literature, College & Research Libraries, 48, pp. 95-103, (1987); Krompart, Researching Faculty Status: A Selected Annotated Bibliography, College & Research Libraries, 53, pp. 439-449, (1992); A Classification of Institutions of Higher Education, (1987); Boyer, Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate, (1990); English, Librarian Status in the Eighty-Nine U.S. Academic Institutions of the Association of Research Libraries: 1982, College & Research Libraries, 44, pp. 199-211, (1983); Tenure and Retrenchment Practices in Higher Education: A Technical Report, Journal of the College and University Personnel Association, 31, pp. 1-226, (1980); Rayman, Goudy, Research and Publication Requirements in University Libraries, College & Research Libraries, 41, pp. 43-48, (1980); ACRL Academic Status Committee, Academic Status Survey, C&RL News, 12, (1981); ACRL Academic Status Committee, Model Statement of Criteria and Procedures for Appointment, Promotion in Academic Rank, and Tenure for College and University Librarians, C&RL News, 48, (1987); ACRL Board of Directors, Highlights of the 1975 Midwinter Meeting, C&RL News, 36, (1975); Yuker, Faculty Workload: Research, Theory, and Interpretation, (1984); Budd, Seavey, Characteristics of Journal Authorship by Academic Librarians, College & Research Libraries, 51, pp. 463-470, (1990); Kenny, Tietjen, Witthus, Increasing Scholarly Productivity among Library Faculty: Strategies for a Medium-Sized Library, Journal of Academic Librarianship, 16, pp. 276-279, (1990)