CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Autonomy and Alienation

Tác giả

CALLAN E.

Năm xuất bản

1994

Source title

Journal of Philosophy of Education

Số trích dẫn

DOI

10.1111/j.1467-9752.1994.tb00311.x

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85013880581&doi=10.1111%2fj.1467-9752.1994.tb00311.x&partnerID=40&md5=a669b6cdf6af8f1fdae0eb43fc5d9524

Tóm tắt

Autonomy as a personal ideal presupposes a conception of the self who owns and rules in a life that exemplifies the ideal. Philosophical discussion of autonomy continues to be injuenced by the thesis that the governing core of the self resides in our capacities for disengaged rational reflection, even when the thesis is not explicitly avowed. This conception of autonomy is shown to be inadequate because it alienates us from what matters in our lives. An alternative conception of autonomy is presented that accords a substantial role to rejection and choice within an autonomous life without falling preq, to the charge of alienation. Some divergent implications of the two rival conceptions of autonomy for an understanding of liberal education are examined. Finally, the question of the value of autonomy from a social perspective is briefly discussed. Copyright © 1994, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved

Từ khóa

Tài liệu tham khảo

Callan E., Autonomy and Schooling, (1988); Callan E., Pluralism and civic education, Studies in Philosophy and Education, 11, pp. 65-87, (1991); Callan E., Tradition and integrity in moral education, American Journal of Education, 101, pp. 1-28; Cooper D., Authenticity and Learning, (1983); Cuypers S., Is personal autonomy the first principle of education, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 26, pp. 5-17, (1992); Dearden R., Review of Autonomy and Schooling, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 24, pp. 127-131, (1990); Dunlop F., The education of the emotions and the promotion of autonomy: are they really compatible, British Journal of Educational Studies, 34, pp. 152-160, (1986); Dworkin G., (1976); Finnis J., Fundamentals of Ethics, (1983); Gaden G., (1985); Gaden G., Rehabilitating responsibility, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 25, pp. 27-38, (1991); Galston W.A., Cosmopolitan altruism, Social Philosophy and Policy, 10, pp. 118-134, (1993); Hare R., Moral Thinking, (1981); Hirst P.H., Peters R.S., The Logic of Education, (1970); Hirst P.H., Knowledge and the Curriculum, (1974); Kymikka W., Liberalism, Community and Culture, (1989); Lovibond S., Realism and Imagination in Ethics, (1983); Macedo S., Liberal Virtues, (1990); Monroe K., Et al., Altruism and the theory of rational action: rescuers of Jews in Nazi Europe, Ethics, 101, pp. 103-122, (1990); Peters R.S., The Ethics of Education, (1966); Peters R.S., Reason and passion, pp. 58-79, (1972); Peters R.S., The justification of education, Philosophy of Education, pp. 239-267, (1973); Rawls J., Political Liberalism, (1993); Riesman D., The Lonely Crowd, (1961); Sandel M., Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, (1982); Sandel M., The procedural republic and the unencumbered self, Political Theory, 12, pp. 81-96, (1984); Smith R., Freedom and Discipline, (1985); Strawson P., Freedom and Resentment and Other Essays, (1974); Quine W.V.O., Word and Object, (1960); Taylor C., Responsibility for self, Free Will, pp. 111-126, (1982); Taylor C., Sources of the Self; Weil J., Mendelssohn is on the Roof, (1991); White J., Education and the Good Life, (1990); Wiggins D., Needs, Truth, Values: Essays in the Philosophy of Values, (1991); Wolf S., Freedom Within Reason, (1990)