Social work and the liberal arts: Renewing the commitment
Reid P.N.; Wilkins W.P.
1991
Journal of Social Work Education
8
10.1080/10437797.1991.10672190
Throughout the history of professional social work education, the liberal arts have been regarded as not simply the most suitable basis for professional education but as the essential basis. As undergraduate programs developed more fully, liberal arts content inevitably decreased. Also, because graduate programs rely increasingly on undergraduate programs for students, the need to define clearly the nature and purpose of liberal education for social work students has become even more apparent. This article addresses the purposes of liberal education and the "content" versus "perspective" controversies and their relation to social work preparation. The premise is that social work has a natural alliance with the liberal arts. For one reason, social work is a complex set of "ideals" reflecti?ig many ideas that have had currency over the century in the literature, politics, economics, histoiy, philosophy, and the human and natural sciences that compose the liberal arts. Social work is not so much "technology of intervention" or science, as it is applied humanistic value. As such, the relationship of social work to the liberal arts is one of intertwined strands. This article proposes that social work education emphasize the ideas, assumptions, and events that have shaped, and are shaping, the profession, and in so doing, recast and strengthen its relationship with the liberal arts. © 1991 by the Council on Social Work Education, Inc.
(1988); Aldridge G., McGrath E., (1965); Bloom A., (1987); Brill N., (1978); Compton B., Galaway B., (1979); (1988); Crunden R., pp. 1889-1920, (1982); Dean R.B., Exploring epistemolo-gies: Social work action as a reflection of philosophical assumptions, Journal of Social Work Education, 25, 1, pp. 46-54, (1989); Ehrenreich J., (1985); Flexner A., (1946); Gil D., (1989); Glisson C., Fischer J., Statistical training for social workers, Journal of Social Work Education, 23, pp. 50-58, (1987); Harper W.R., (1905); Hirsch E.D., (1989); Karger H., Stoesz D., (1990); Lewis H., (1982); Lowe G., The graduate-only debate in social, Journal of Education for Social, 21, 3, pp. 52-62, (1985); Macarov D., (1978); Popple P., Leighninger L., (1990); Pumphrey R.E., Pumphrey M.W., (1961); Schoor A., (1968); Siporin M., Moral philosophy in social work, Social Service Review, 56, pp. 518-531, (1982); Stimpson C.R., Is there a core in this curriculum? Change, pp. 19-23, (1988); Titmus R.M., (1968); Wegener C., (1978); (1966)
Article
Scopus