CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Classic texts in undergraduate classes: So far so good

Tác giả

Scheid-Cook T.L.

Năm xuất bản

1990

Source title

Innovative Higher Education

Số trích dẫn

0

DOI

10.1007/BF00889736

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-34247748482&doi=10.1007%2fBF00889736&partnerID=40&md5=7e59435cb70bc82f14df2a7d6bfb2829

Tóm tắt

This paper describes and evaluates a classic text project in terms of its stated objectives. First, to have a large number of students read a few classic works in more than one class. Second, to promote discussion of texts among students and faculty and third, to integrate core classes. Survey data collected from students and faculty evaluations point to the success of this project. The factors which contributed to its success are considered. The project was innovative because faculty selected important texts that could be used in a variety of courses and which would promote a broad based liberal education by exposing students to a diversity of perspectives. © 1990 Human Sciences Press.

Từ khóa

Tài liệu tham khảo

Integrity in the College Classroom” A Report to the College Community, College Teaching, 33, pp. 117-124, (1985); Barnes S., Bento R., Hijiya J., Beyond the Multidisciplinary in Nuclear Education, Journal of College Science Teaching, 15, pp. 24-25, (1985); Bloom A., The Failure of the University, Daedalus, 103, pp. 58-66, (1974); Boyer E.L., College: The Undergraduate Experience in America, The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, (1987); Bok D., Higher Learning, (1986); Brick E., McGrath E.J., Innovation in Liberal Arts Colleges, (1969); Ellner C.L., Barnes C.P., Studies of College Teaching, (1983); Gaff J., Reforming Undergraduate General Education, Liberal Education, 74, pp. 7-11, (1988); Hirsch E.D., Cultural Literacy, American Scholar, 52, pp. 159-169, (1983); Hook S., An Open Letter to the Stanford University Faculty Senate, Partisan Review, 55, pp. 653-659, (1988); Lawler P.A., Reaganism, Liberal Education, and Conservatism, College Teaching, 34, pp. 104-107, (1986); McLaughlin M.B., A Book List and a “Common Text”: Redeeming a Good Idea Gone Wrong, College Teaching, 34, pp. 150-154, (1986); Menges R.J., Mathis B.C., Halliburton D., Marinoviche M., Svinicki M., Strengthening Professional Development: Lessons from the Program for Faculty Development at Stanford, The Journal of Higher Education, 59, pp. 291-304, (1988); Parr S.R., Skills in a Vacuum, The Antioch Review, 43, pp. 434-444, (1985); Riley G., Goals of a Liberal Education: Making the Actual and the Ideal Meet, Liberal Education, 4, pp. 436-444, (1979); Schachter H.L., Inquiry, Awareness, and Exposure to Classic Texts, Liberal Education, 72, pp. 121-123, (1986); Todorov T., Crimes Against Humanities, The New Republic, 3, pp. 26-30, (1989); Trimbur J., To Reclaim a Legacy, Cultural Literacy and the Discourse of Crisis, Liberal Education, 72, pp. 109-119, (1986); Vars G.F., Designs for General Education: Alternative Approaches to Curriculum Integration, The Journal of Higher Education, 53, pp. 216-225, (1982); Wilson J.D., Student Learning in Higher Education, (1981)

Nơi xuất bản

Kluwer Academic Publishers-Human Sciences Press

Hình thức xuất bản

Article

Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus