CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Faculty at work: Focus on research, scholarship, and service
Tác giả
Blackburn R.T.; Bieber J.P.; Lawrence J.H.; Trautvetter L.
Năm xuất bản
1991
Source title
Research in Higher Education
Số trích dẫn
59
DOI
10.1007/BF00992183
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
Within the framework of cognitive motivation theory, selected personal and environmental motivational variables for faculty in eight liberal arts and science departments from community colleges, liberal arts colleges, comprehensive colleges and universities, and research universities were regressed against faculty allocation of work effort given to research, scholarship, and service. The data came from a 1988 national survey of faculty. Gender, (sociodemographic), quality of graduate school attended, career age, and rank (career); self-competence and self-efficacy regarding research, scholarship, and service and percent time prefer to give to research, scholarship, and service (self-valuations); and institutional preference, consensus and support, and colleague commitment to research, scholarship, and service (perception of the environment) were entered into regressions. R2s were generally strong (.64 for liberal arts-I institutions) and significant. For all institutional types, self-valuation (self-competence and -efficacy) motivators significantly accounted for the explained variance. Sociodemographic and career variables did not explain appreciable amounts of variance. © 1991 Human Sciences Press, Inc.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Allison P.D., Stewart J.A., Productivity differences among scientists: Evidence for accumulative advantage, American Sociological Review, 39, 4, pp. 596-606, (1974); Astin H.S., Factors affecting women's scholarly productivity, The Higher Education of Women, pp. 133-157, (1978); Baldwin R.G., Blackburn R.T., The academic career as a developmental process: Implications for higher education, The Journal of Higher Education, 52, 6, pp. 598-614, (1981); Bandura A., Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral science, Psychological Review, 84, 2, pp. 191-215, (1977); Blackburn R.T., Boberg A., O'Connell C., Pellino G.R., Project for Faculty Development Program Evaluation, (1980); Blackburn R.T., Lawrence J.H., Aging and the quality of faculty performance, Review of Education Research, 23, 3, pp. 265-290, (1986); Blackburn R.T., Mackie C., Test-Retest Reliability Coefficients: Faculty at Work, (1990); Boyer C.M., Lewis D.R., And on the Seventh Day: Faculty Consulting and Supplemental Income, (1985); Breneman D.W., Youn I.K., Academic Labor Markets and Careers, (1988); A classification of institutions of higher education, Chronicle of Higher Education, 33, 43, pp. 22-30, (1987); 1989 National Survey of Faculty Data, (1989); Clark M.J., Centra J.A., Influences on the career accomplishments of Ph.D.'s, Research in Higher Education, 23, 3, pp. 256-259, (1985); Finkelstein M.J., The American Academic Profession: A Synthesis of the Social Scientific Inquiry Since World War II, (1984); Gilligan C., In a Different Voice, (1982); Ladd E.C., Lipset S.M., Technical Report—1975 Survey of the American Professoriate, (1975); Landino R.A., Owen S.V., Self-efficacy in university faculty, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 33, pp. 1-14, (1988); Lawrence J.H., Blackburn R.T., Faculty careers: Maturation, demographic, and historical effects, Research in Higher Education, 22, 2, pp. 135-154, (1985); Schoen L.G., Winocur S., An investigation of the self-efficacy of male and female academics, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 32, pp. 307-320, (1988); Staw B.B., Motivation research versus the art of faculty management, College and University Organization: Insights from the Behavioral Sciences, pp. 63-83, (1984); Tuckman H.P., Leahey J., What is an article worth?, Journal of Political Economy, 83, 5, pp. 951-967, (1975)
Nơi xuất bản
Kluwer Academic Publishers-Human Sciences Press
Hình thức xuất bản
Article
Open Access
All Open Access; Green Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus