CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

How many psychology journals are enough?: A study of the use of psychology journals by undergraduates

Tác giả

Hardesty L.; Oltmanns G.

Năm xuất bản

1989

Source title

Serials Librarian

Số trích dẫn

DOI

10.1300/J123v16n01_11

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-67650810050&doi=10.1300%2fJ123v16n01_11&partnerID=40&md5=a9fa326f0015cfaa50dc14e74ad41d82

Tóm tắt

Is there a core of psychology journals that will satisfy most needs of undergraduate psychology students? The authors examined journal citations of 105 senior psychology theses written durin a seven-year period at a major research university and a small liberal arts college. relatively few journal titles accounted for most of the citations at each institution. The research university students did not cite more journal titles and articles than did the liberal arts college students. Nevertheless, beyond the most heavily cited journals, the students from each institution cited in common relatively few journals. With improved faculty guidance, a small number of journals could satisfy most needs of undergraduate psychology students at both institutions. © 1989 by The Haworth Press, Inc.

Từ khóa

Tài liệu tham khảo

Price D.J.D.S., Science since Babylon, pp. 164-169, (1975); White H.S., The Economic Interaction of Scholarly Journal Publishing and Libraries During the Present Period of Cost Increases and Budget Reductions: Implications for Serials Libraries, The Serials Librarian, 1, (1977); Gennaro R.D., Escalating Journal Prices: Time to Fight Back, American Libraries, 8, pp. 69-74, (1977); Knapp L.C., Lenzini R.T., Price Index for 1987: U.S. Periodical Prices, Library Journal, 112, (1987); Katz B., Katz L.S., Magazines for College Libraries, (1986); Accardi J.J., Psychology, Magazines for College Libraries; Wiberley S.E., Journal Rankings from Citation Studies: A Comparison of National and Local Data from Social Work, Library Quarterly, 52, (1982); Bradford S.C., Documentation, (1953); Kent A., Lancour H., Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, (1971); Garfield E., Is Citation Frequency a Valid Criterion for Selecting Journals, Essays of an Information Scientist, One, pp. 289-290, (1977); Garfield E., Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation, Science, 178, pp. 471-479, (1972); Line M.B., Sandison A., Practical Interpretation of Citation and Use Studies, College ? Research Libraries, 36, pp. 393-396, (1975); Stankus T., Rice B., Handle With Care: Use and Citation Data for Science Journal Management, Collection Management, 4, pp. 95-110, (1982); Scales P.A., Citation Analyses as Indicators of the Use of Serials: A Comparison of Ranked Title Lists Produced by Citation Counting and From Use Data, Journal of Documentation, 32, pp. 17-25, (1976); Mace K.C., Warner H.D., Rating of Psychology Journals, American Psychologist, 28, pp. 184-186, (1973); Hohn R.L., Fine M.J., Rating and Misratings: A Reply to Mace and Warner, American Psychologist, 28, (1973); Book M., Unfamiliarity Breeds Disdain: Comment on Department Chairmens Rating of Psychology Journals,”, American Psychologist, 28, pp. 1012-1013, (1973); Gynther M.D., On Mace and Warners Journal Ratings,”, American Psychologist, 28, pp. 10-13, (1973); Koulack D., Keselman J.J., Ratings of Psychology Journals by Members of the American Psychological Association, American Psychologist, 30, pp. 1049-1053, (1975); Levin J.R., Kratochwill T.R., The Name of the Journal Fame Game: Quality or Familiarity?, American Psychologist, 31, pp. 673-674, (1976); Porter A.L., Use Lists With Caution, American Psychologist, 31, pp. 674-675, (1976); Buss A.R., McDermott J.R., Rating of Psychology Journals Compared to Objective Measures of Journal Impact, American Psychologist, 31, (1976); White M.J., Geoffrey White K., “Citation Analysis of Psychology, Journals,” American Psychologist, 32, (1977); Thome F.C., The Citation Index: Another Case of Spurious Validity, Joumal of Clinical Psychology, 33, pp. 1158-1159, (1977); Philippe Rushton J., Roediger H.L., An Evaluation of 80 Psychology Journals Based on the Science Citation Index, American Psychologist, 33, pp. 520-523, (1978); Over R., Journal Ranking by Citation Analysis: Some Inconsistencies, American Psychologist, 33, pp. 778-780, (1978); Meitzer H., Ratings of Journals by and for Personality Psychologist, American Psychologist, 33, pp. 776-777, (1978); Robinson D., Impact on Science, American Psychologist, 34, pp. 91-92, (1979); Stamps L.E., Fehr L.A., Journal Ratings Revisited: A Closer Scrutiny of Impact Factors, American Psychologist, 35, pp. 1048-1049, (1980); Buffardi L.C., Nichols J.A., Citation Impact, Acceptance Rate, and APAJournals, American Psychologist, 36, pp. 1453-1456, (1981); Fehr L.A., Stamps L.E., McMahon P.M., Journal Evaluations: Are They Really Evaluations of Authors?, American Psychologist, 36, pp. 1456-1457, (1981); Boor M., The Citation Impact Factor: Another Dubious Index of Journal Quality, American Psychologist, 37, pp. 975-977, (1982); Haynes J.P., An Empirical Method for Determining Core Psychology Journals, American Psychologist, 38, (1982); White M.J., Journal Citations, American Psychologist, 39, (1984); Hogan J.D., Hedgepeth R., Journal Quality: The Issue of Diversity, American Psychologist, 38, (1983); Meacham J.A., Journal Quality: The Problem of Size, American Psychologist, 39, (1984); The College Handbook, (1986); Stewart B., Periodicals and the Liberal Arts College Library, College ? Research Libraries, 36, pp. 371-378, (1975); Line M.B., Rank Lists Based on Citations and Library Uses as Indicators of Journal Usage in Individual Libraries, Collection Management, 2, (1978)