The University of Utah's Immersion/Multiliteracy Program: An Example of an Area Studies Approach to the Design of First?year College Foreign Language Instruction
Sternfeld S.
1989
Foreign Language Annals
2
10.1111/j.1944-9720.1989.tb02757.x
The University of Utah's Immersion/Multiliteracy (IM/ML) Program is an outgrowth of the post?WWII movement towards an extension of the area studies model to modern foreign language study. Where the IM/ML program has sought to innovate is in the creation of a first?year language course based on the area studies model. Using a methodology based on the Canadian immersion approach, the IM/ML Program has set as its goal multiliteracy, i.e, the pursuit of intellectually challenging and culturally broadening activities in more than one language. This article describes the pilot IM/ML Program in Spanish in which first?year language students used Spanish?language newspapers and culture/civilizations texts to study the history, geography and current affairs of Latin America. Results of the pilot program indicate 1) that IM/ML students are for the most part keeping up with students in traditional courses with respect to skill development, and 2) that the IM/ML Program holds promise for enhancing the contribution of introductory foreign language study to students' liberal education. © 1989 American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages
Ausubel, Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View, (1968); Beretta, Program?Fair Language Teaching Evaluation, TESOL Quarterly, 20, pp. 431-444, (1986); Billard, Yves, Dequeker-Fergon, Lepagnot, Lepagnot, Journal Historique de la France, (1986); Burnett, Bruce Robinson F., Foreign Languages and International Studies: A Consortia1 Approach to Institutional Development, adfl, 17, 1, pp. 9-13, (1985); Campbell, The Immersion Education Approach to Foreign Language Teaching, Studies on Immersion Education: A Collection for US. Educators, (1984); Champagne, Responding to the Challenge of Survival: Multidisciplinary Language Courses, Foreign Language Annals, 11, pp. 81-85, (1978); Dease, The Humanities and Foreign Languages: Analogous or Anomalous, adfl, 13, pp. 17-19, (1982); Dirks, Strengthening Foreign Languages in Humanities and in International Studies, adfl, 8, pp. 26-30, (1976); Edwards, Henry, Wesche, Krashen, Clement, Kruidenier, Second?Language Acquisition Through Subject?Matter Learning: A Study of Sheltered Psychology Classes at the University of Ottawa, Canadian Modern Language Review, 41, pp. 268-282, (1984); Elbow, Embracing Contmries: Bplomtions in Learning and Teaching, (1986); Fillmore, Ideal Readers and Real Readers, Georgetown University Roundtable on Language and Linguistics, (1981); Camel, Language and Literature: Allies not Enemies, ADFL Bulletin, 15, pp. 8-11, (1984); Gaudiani, Cummins, Tonkin; Genesee, Bilingual Education of Majority?Language Children: The Immersion Experiments in Revied, Applied Psycholinguistics, 4, pp. 1-46, (1983); Genesee, Second Language Learning through Immersion: A Review of U.S. Programs, Review of Educational Research, 55, pp. 541-561, (1985); Genesee, Learning through Two Languages: Studies of Immersion and Bilingual Education, (1987); Giamatti, On Behalf of the Humanities, adfl, 10, pp. 10-12, (1979); Graman, The Gap between Lower? and Upper?Division Spanish Courses: A Barrier to Coming up through the Ranks, Hispania, 70, pp. 929-935, (1987); Haenicke, Towards Unity in the Humanities, adfl, 11, pp. 10-13, (1979); Haenicke, Foreign Language Study in International Education, adfl, 8, pp. 11-15, (1976); Hammerly, The Immersion Approach: Litmus Test of Second Language Acquisition through Classroom Communication, The Modern Language Journal, 71, pp. 395-401, (1987); Hirsch E.D., Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know, (1987); Hornby, Achieving Second Language Fluency through Immersion Education, Foreign Language Annals, 13, pp. 107-113, (1980); Unsere Geschichte, (1985); Incera, Compendio de la civilizacion espanola e iberomericana, (1980); Jorden, Language and Area Studies: In Search of a Meaningful Relationship, adfl, 14, pp. 25-30, (1982); Jurasek, Integrating Foreign Languages into the College Curriculum, The Modern Language Journal, 72, pp. 52-58, (1988); Kelly, 25 Centuries of Language Teaching, (1969); Kiddle, Wegmann, El Conflicto entre los Sexos, Perspectivas Temas de deHoy y de Siempre, (1988); Knoll, Languages and International Studies, adfl, 8, pp. 22-25, (1976); Krashen, Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition, (1982); Krashen, The Input Hypothesis. Issues and Implications, (1985); Lafayette, Buscaglia, Students Learn Language via a Civilization Course: A Comparison of Second Language Classroom Environments, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, pp. 323-342, (1985); Lambert, A Canadian Experiment in the Development of Bilingual Competence, Canadian Modern Language Review, 31, pp. 108-116, (1974); Lambert, Ncker G.R., The Bilingual Education of Children: The St. Lambert Experiment, (1972); Lapkin, How Well Do Immersion Students Speak and Write French, Canadian Modern Language Review, 40, pp. 574-585, (1984); Lapkin, Swain, Kamin, Hanna, Late Immersion in Perspective: The Peel Study, Canadian Modern Language Review, 39, pp. 182-206, (1983); Lee, A New Interdisciplinary Program, adfl, 15, pp. 4-6, (1983); Maran, El Mundo Iberoamericano: Sus Pueblos y sus Tierras, (1983); Maran, El Mundo Iberoamericano: Hombres en su Historia, (1974); Meyer, Emery, Getting Started; Reading Techniques that Work from the Very First Day, Foreign Language Annals, 21, pp. 423-431, (1988); Morello, Attitudes of Students of French Toward Required Language Study, Foreign Language Annals, 21, pp. 435-442, (1988); Nelson, Culture and culture: An Integrated, Multidisciplinary Approach to Foreign Language Requirements, Modern Language Journal, 56, pp. 210-217, (1972); Newmark, A Minimal Language?Teaching Program, The Psychology of Second Language Learning, (1971); Oller, Languages Tests at School: A Pragmatic Approach, (1979); Patrikis, Is There a Culture in this Language, adfl, 18, pp. 3-8, (1987); Patton, Qualitative Evaluation Methods, (1980); Pawley, How Bilingual are French Immersion Students, Modern Language Journal, 65, pp. 43-53, (1981); Pequeño Lamwe Ilustrado, (1976); Rivers, A New Curriculum for New Purposes, Foreign Language Annals, 18, pp. 37-43, (1985); Rogers, Medley, Language with a Purpose: Using Authentic Materials in the Foreign Language Classroom, Foreign Language Annals, 21, pp. 67-76, (1988); Sternfeld, The Applicability of the Immersion Approach to Beginning College Foreign Language Instruction, Foreign Language Annals, 21, pp. 221-226, (1988); Stevick, Teaching Languages: A Way and Ways, (1980); Suozzo, Once More with Content: Shifting Emphasis in Intermediate French, Fmnch Review, 54, pp. 405-411, (1981); Swaffar, Reading Authentic Texts in a Foreign Language: A Cognitive Model, The Modern Language Journal, 69, pp. 15-34, (1985); Swain, Immersion: Early, Late or Partial, Canadian Modern Language Review, 43, pp. 577-585, (1978); Tonkin, Foreign Language and the Humanities, adfl, 17, pp. 5-8, (1985); Traven, Macario, (1971); VanPatten, On Babies and Bathwater: Input in Foreign Language Learning, The Modern Language Journal, 71, pp. 156-164, (1987)
Article
Scopus