Fundamentalism, liberal education and freedom of speech: An issue for the public SPEAKING INSTRUCTOR
Duffy B.K.; Duffy S.
1984
Communication Education
3
10.1080/03634528409384759
[No abstract available]
Seymour Martin Lipset and Earl Raab, “The Election & The Evangelicals/” Commentary, 71, (1981); Jean Bethke Elshtain, “The ‘Born Agutin’ Smorgasbord,” The Nation, (1978); Lipset; Ellis W.E., Evolution, Fundamentalism, and the Historian: An Historiographical Review, The Historian: A Journal of History, 44, (1981); Hoffer E., The True Believer, Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements; Elshtain; Delgado R., Limits to Proselytizing, Society, 17, (1980); Elshtain; Solzhenitsyn A.I., A World Split Apart, Vital Speeches; Krauthammer; Quoted in David Olsen, “Religion and the Law,” Christianity Today, 21 Apr, (1978); Krauthammer; Hart R.P., Speech Monographs, 38, (1971); Carl Horn, “Taking God to Court,” Christianity Today, (1981); The authors gratefully acknowledge the help of attorney Steven Henry of the South Carolina American Civil Liberties Union in formulating this position; See Dominic A. Infante, “The Argumentative Student in the Speech Communication Classroom: An Investigation and Implications,” Communication Education, 31, pp. 141-148, (1982); For a discussion of the role of criticism in the speech evaluation process see Gerald M. Phillips, “Rhetoric and the Proper Study of Man, Communication Education, 27, pp. 189-201, (1978); Lifton R.J., Thought Reform and the Psychology ofTotalism, (New York: Norton, 1963); see also J. A. C. Brown, Techniques of Persuasion, pp. 267-293
Article
Scopus