Spatial ability and achievement in introductory physics
Pallrand G.J.; Seeber F.
1984
Journal of Research in Science Teaching
83
10.1002/tea.3660210508
This research was undertaken to clarify the nature of the relationship between visual?spatial abilities and achievement in science courses. A related purpose was to determine what influence visual?spatial abilities have on the high attribution rate characteristic of many introductory college?level science courses. Three sections of introductory college level physics (S = 136) and one nonscience liberal arts section (S = 52) received pre? and postmeasures of visual?spatial ability in the areas of perception, orientation, and visualization. Increases in visual?spatial abilities were greatest with an experimental section that received a spatial intervention. These gains were related to test items that utilized graphical form and to laboratory work. Substantial gains in visual?spatial ability were also registered by a placebo and by control sections. These increases suggest that taking introductory physics improves visual?spatial abilities. Although students who withdrew from the course demonstrated mathematics skills comparable to those of students who completed the course, their scores on perception tests were appreciably lower. Visual?spatial scores of the liberal arts group were lower than those of the physics sections, suggesting that visual?spatial ability influences course selection. Copyright © 1984 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company
Andersson B., Science teaching and the development of thinking, (1976); Bishop A., Developing spatial abilities, Educational Studies of Mathematics, 10, 2, pp. 135-146, (1979); Brickmann E.H., Programmed instruction as a technique for improving spatial visualization, Journal of Applied Psychology, 50, 2, pp. 179-184, (1966); Dawson J.I.M., Cultural and physicological influences upon spatial perceptual processes in West Africa—Part I, International Journal of Psychology, 2, 2, pp. 115-128, (1967); Ekstrom R., French J., Harmon H., Derman D., Manual for kit of factor?referenced cognitive tests, (1976); Hunt E., On the nature of intelligence, Science, 219, pp. 141-146, (1983); Hudson H.T., McIntire W.R., Correlation between mathematical skills and success in physics, American Journal of Physics, 45, 5, pp. 470-471, (1977); Karplus R., Science curriculum study, (1971); McGee M., Human spatial abilities: psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences, Psychological Bulletin, 86, 5, pp. 889-918, (1979); Mitchelmore M., Three?dimensional geometrical drawings in three cultures, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 11, 2, pp. 205-216, (1980); Piaget J., Construction of reality in the child, (1954); Piaget J., Inhelder B., The child's conception of geometry, (1960); Piaget J., Inhelder B., Mental imagery in the child, (1971); Poole C., Stanley G., A factorial and predictive study of spatial abilities, Australian Journal of Psychology, 24, 3, pp. 317-320, (1972); Roe S., A psychologist examines 64 eminent scientists, Scientific American, 187, pp. 21-22, (1952); Siemankowski F., MacKnight F., Spatial cognition: success prognosticator in college science courses, Journal of College Science Teaching, 59, pp. 1-56, (1971); Talley L., The use of three?dimensional visualization as a moderator in the higher cognitive learning of concepts in college level chemistry, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 10, pp. 263-269, (1973); Tobias S., (1976); Whimbey A., Teaching sequential thought: the cognitive skills approach, Phi Delta Kappan., 59, 4, pp. 255-259, (1977); Witkin H., Et al., Role of field dependent and independent cognitive styles in academic evaluation: A longitudinal study, Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, pp. 197-211, (1977)
Article
Scopus