Goals, purposes, and future of undergraduate education in the psychology of aging
Schonfield D.; Chatfield S.
1976
Educational Gerontology
2
10.1080/0360127760010407
The study of aging can bridge divisions between biology, social sciences, and humanities, develop an understanding of causal interrelationships, and help in distinguishing between fact and opinion. An introductory course in gerontology should, therefore, be firmly tied to the liberal arts core of higher education, and not merely provide an assembly line of facts. Why particular problems have been investigated is as worthy of discussion as the findings themselves. The practical implications of research deserve emphasis, but the aim of university education is not to train pressure groups. Undergraduates should be helped to appreciate difficulties in designing and interpreting gerontological studies, as well as to realize that they are not yet ready to undertake independent empirical investigations. © 1976 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Beresford-Howe C., The book of Eve, (1974); Botwinick J., Arenberg D., Disparate time spans in sequential studies of aging, Experimental Aging Research, 2, pp. 55-61, (1976); Bowra C.M., Memories, (1966); Hulicka I.M., Morganti J.B., An undergraduate concentration in the psychology of aging: Approach, program, and evaluation, Educational Gerontology, 1, pp. 107-118, (1976); Laurence M., The stone angel, (1964); Schonfield D., The university and its professional schools, Improving College and University Teaching, 10, pp. 57-61, (1962); Schonfield D., Translations in gerontology—From lab to life, American Psychologist, 29, pp. 796-801, (1974); Schonfield D., Chatfield S., Time estimation: A project for an undergraduate gerontology class, Canadian Association on Gerontology News-letter, 3, 1, pp. 4-5, (1976); Schonfield D., Wenger L., Age limitation of perceptual span, Nature, 253, pp. 377-378, (1975); Wertheimer M., Productive thinking, (1945)
Article
Scopus