CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Language science in the tertiary curriculum

Tác giả

Parkinson F.C.

Năm xuất bản

1973

Source title

Instructional Science

Số trích dẫn

0

DOI

10.1007/BF00143063

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-34248959287&doi=10.1007%2fBF00143063&partnerID=40&md5=0abb900d64d8410a98a19fc088729101

Tóm tắt

The goal of linguistics has been in dispute since its origin as a scientific discipline. The situation remains confused and consequently the curricular position of linguistics is ambiguous. An examination of the historical reasons for this indicates the following conclusions: At the time when language was first proposed as a subject for scientific study the natural sciences were still dominated by the mechanical model of Newtonian physics; this attitude of mind has inhibited the development of linguistics. Further development ought logically to depend on the harmonisation of linguistics with modern scientific concepts, such as relativity, probability, system and field. Such a move would constitute in part a new goal for linguistics. If such an innovation is admitted, those areas where language study overlaps with other subjects, e.g. psychology, logic and anthropology, provide natural exit points for a study of language and the epistemology of science. Linguistics is therefore capable of serving as a foundational discipline in a liberal arts curriculum. Its particular claim to assume this role lies in the fact that language is the object of both humanistic and scientific study. Hence to give linguistics a more central role in the tertiary curriculum offers a fundamental educational benefit in narrowing the cultural gap between the arts and science, and it is worth considering a change of emphasis in the curriculum to achieve this end. The aim of this paper is not to suggest detailed changes but to stimulate discussion of this consideration. © 1973 Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company.

Từ khóa

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bloomfield L., Language, (1935); Choky N., Syntactic Structures, (1957); Choky N., On the Notion ‘Rule of Grammar’, On the Structure of Language and its Mathematical Aspects, pp. 6-24, (1961); Choky N., Language and Mind, (1968); Godel R., Les sources manuscrites au “Cours de linguistique générale, (1957); Haugen E., Directions in Modern Linguistics, Language, 33, pp. 211-22, (1951); Heisenberg W., Physics and Philosophy, (1959); Jakobson R., On the Structure of Language and its Mathematical Aspects, (1961); Joos M., Description of Language Design, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 22, 6, pp. 701-9, (1950); McLuhan M., Understanding Media, (1957); Montgomery C., Review of Bach, E., An Introduction to Transformational Grammars, Language, 41, pp. 632-40, (1965); Myers L.M., Two Approaches to Language, Publications of the Modern Language Association, 77, 4, pp. 1-6, (1962); de Saussure F., Course in General Linguistics, (1960); Vickers G., Value Systems and Social Process, (1970); Whorf B.L., Language, Thought and Reality, (1956)

Nơi xuất bản

Kluwer Academic Publishers

Hình thức xuất bản

Article

Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus