The christian character of certain liberal arts colleges with a focus on the academic arena
Dundon M.C.
1971
Sociology of Religion: A Quarterly Review
2
10.2307/3710139
The purpose of this study was to determine whether Catholic colleges have a distinctive Christian character with respect to their academic beliefs and practices as perceived by their academic deans. The Christian Character Questionnaire (CCQ) was designed by the writer from post- Vatican Council II descriptions of the contemporary Catholic college or university. The CCQ consists of 45 statements to be answered in two ways, evaluating both the real and the ideal academic beliefs and practices of the faculty and administration of the college. The subjects consisted of academic deans from a random sample of 42 Catholic, 42 Protestant, and 41 non-sectarian colleges. Ninety-nine responded. Statistical analyses indicated strong agreement between responses of Catholic and Protestant college deans. Since the particular interest of this study was the relationship between responses of the Catholic and nonsectarian college deans, the 42 (out of 90) items in which they differed significantly were proposed as indicators of a distinctive Christian character of the Catholic colleges in this study. At the same time this distinctiveness is qualified by the fact that 32 of these 42 differences were also true of the Protestant versus non-sectarian college deans. © 1971 Oxford University Press.
Accredited Institutions of Higher Education, pp. 1969-1970, (1969); Astin A., The College Environment. Washington, D.C, American Council on Education, (1968); Donovan J.D., The Academic Man in the Catholic College, (1964); Ellis J.T., American Catholics and the intellectual life, Thought, 30, pp. 351-388, (1955); Getzels J., Lipham J., Campbell R., Educational Administration as a Social Process, Theory, Research, Practice; Gleason P., American Catholic higher education: A historical perspective, The Shape of Catholic Higher Education, pp. 15-53, (1967); Greeley A., The Hesitant Pilgrim. New York, The Changing Catholic College Chicago; A Profile of Catholic Higher Education; Grismer R.T., Christian formation in the university, Catholic Educational Review, 66, pp. 523-532; Gross E., Grambsch P., University Goals and Academic Power; Hanlon J., Administration and Education; Hassenger R., The Shape of Catholic Higher Education; The structure of Catholic higher education, In P. Gleason, pp. 295-323; Hesburgh T.M., The vision of a great Catholic university, Catholic Mind, 66, pp. 42-54; Hodgkinson H., Institutions in Transition, A Study of Change in Higher Education. Berkeley, California; Jencks C., Riesman D., The Academic Revolution, (1968); Kimball J., Analysis of institutional objectives in Michigan community schools, Dissertation Abstracts, 22, (1961); McCluskey N., The Catholic University, (1970); O;Dea T., Amercan Catholic Dilemma: An Inquiry into the Intellectual Life, (1958); Pattillo M., Mackenzie D., Church-Sponsored Higher Education Education in the United States. Washington, D, C: American Council on Education, (1966); Reiss P., The Catholic college: Some built-in tensions, The Shape of Catholic Higher Education, pp. 253-273, (1967); Trent J., Golds J., Catholics in College: Religious Commitment and Intellectual Life, (1967); Weiss R., The environment for learning on the Catholic college campus, The Shape of Catholic Higher Education, pp. 57-82, (1967)
Article
Scopus